Sunday, December 14, 2025

Gold, Silver, Honest Money Continue Higher as Dow, S&P 500 Make New All-Time Highs; Vince Lanci is a Tool

Editor's Note: Today, I am writing in first person singular, because I believe that when I criticize somebody, I should do it personally. -- Fearless Rick

If you're one of the many people out there who own gold and/or silver, congratulations. You've also probably heard of a fellow by the name of Vince Lanci. He runs a Substack called GoldFix and also does videos hosted by Arcadia Economics, which is Chris Marcus' baby. I have a great deal of respect for Chris Marcus, but wonder about his judgement in putting Lanci on board, because, simply put, Vince Lanci is a tool.

Some of what Lanci writes or opines about in videos makes plenty of sense, which is where one should stop. As Mark Twain so eloquently opined, "It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt." Lanci, who apparently thinks he has to impress his readers or viewers with how smart, and deep, and possessive of intimate knowledge of the inner workings of economics, usually keeps on going, making a complete ass of himself along the way.

I tempt the ghost of Mark Twain by continuing on here, because another Mark Twain pearl of wisdom states, "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience." Point taken, but I'll shoulder the risk.

What really got me going on Vinci Lanci was his post on ZeroHedge this morning, ""Why You Don't Sell Your Physical Gold & Silver." I thought he might point out that you don't sell your precious metals because they're HONEST MONEY in the truest sense of that word, without counterparty risk, or that you can use gold and silver coins and bullion as collateral, but no, Vince, always the sage, wants everybody to hold their gold and silver because it strengthens nations, and the nation in which you live counts your personal wealth as part of theirs.

Complete bunk.

Vince says, "In quiet conversations between nations, they don’t just look at official reserves. They look at total national wealth, which includes what citizens hold," and, "If the government ever faces a real emergency, private balance sheets become part of the national picture instantly."

I wanted to stop reading right there, but my inner journalist has some kind of perverse desire to see people make complete fools of themselves, and Vince was headed in the right direction.

Vince, who usually pens his garf using the regal "we" when it comes to identifying the author, and also spends time with loudmouth nonsense-spouting babblers like Tom Luongo, began inserting random quotes without attribution, as if they were godly proclamations that were undeniable truths. Like,

“The result is a two-layer reserve structure in which central bank holdings and household metal form a single strategic perimeter.”

or,

“States are responding by building deeper metallic buffers inside their borders.”

and,

“Although ownership remains private, the metal becomes visible, recognizable, and potentially mobilizable.”

...whatever that means.

Now, see here, when I use anonymous quotes in the "Toast of the Town" on the Daily Idler and in the usual summaries every month, I do so because the quotes are vitriolic, or funny, or thought-provoking and the original speaker is somebody on an internet chat room, on X, or it was spoken by some passer-by on the street. This is a tradition I started back in 1982, with my first publication of Downtown, the Unbound Magazine. If the speaker, or “quotee” desires attribution, I am only so happy to provide it. In 43 years of doing this, nobody has ever asked. If it's an historical quote by somebody famous, infamous, or otherwise noteworthy, I give proper attribution.

What Lanci has done is essentially hyperventilation of his own theses, which are deeply flawed, and, to be honest, downright stupid.

A couple of commenters agree:

Premium subscriber and obviously a genius, FKALLIBS got eight likes for this critique: "This is probably the dumbest article I've ever read on ZH."

SmallerGovNow2 said, "While I hold and believe in gold/silver, this post is a whole lot of horse shit..." (13 likes)

Lanci has to sound smart because he's on substack, and some people actually pay for his deepest, innermost thoughts on gold and silver. Most of us in the gold and silver accumulation business don't need a daily reminder of why gold and silver this or that. We know it has value and we know that fiat currencies are failing. Trying to sound all in the know about macroeconomic trends and international finnance, like Lanci does all too often (like twie a day) adds nothing to the conversation.

The other reason I think Vince is a tool is because I once offered (try reaching him; it's nearly impossible) to trade advertising on my sites in exchange for his premium substack subscription. After waiting three weeks for a reply, I messaged again, complaining that he could at least acknowledge the message and that his work was crackpot rehashing of other people's ideas. Lo and behold, Lanci then responded with a firm, impolite, "f--- you," informing me that I had no idea how busy he was. Well, darn. it takes less than a minute to respond to a DM, which he proved by responding to my insult. Tool. Utter, cast iron, dead weight TOOL. I'm glad we never made a deal with Lanci. I don't fancy associations with arrogant, self-absorbed bumpkins. WOuld make me look bad. Besides, I would hardly read his stuff, so much of it being reconstituted, partially-plagiarized vomit.

OK, now I know that I write quite a bit, so I probably shouldn’t be criticizing a fellow voice on alternate media, but, when you're wrong, you're wrong, and Lanci is the type who will never admit it. Yes, I make mistakes. Most recently, I stumbled on some math, mistaking $1.972 billion for $1.972 trillion. Sorry, lack of sleep, maybe. I'm usually dead-on, math-wise.

So, if Vince reads this, he'll likely consider me to be beneath him somehow and my criticisms may engender a nasty comment or email. Always good to hear from my betters, I guess. Who cares? I stand uncorrected.

•. •. •. •.

Entering the final session of the week, stocks have risen to new all-time highs on the Dow and S&P. The NASDAQ lags, weighed down by AI skepticism, about 265 points short of its all-time high. On the week, through Thursday's close, the Dow is at a new high, up 749 points; the NASDAQ has gained a mere 15 points, and the S&P, also closing at a record high Thursday, is up 30 points.

With the opening ball 30 minutes ahead, stock futures are split, with the Dow up 92, the NASDAQ down 133 and the S&P off 6 points.

Gold and silver are raging higher. Spot silver reached $64.62 overnight and is holding at $64.16. Gold is rocking, at $$4,339.60, heading towards its all-time high of $4,355.18. Bitcoin ($92,325.51) can't shake the losses.

I'm waiting for somebody like Mike Maloney or maybe even Chris Marcus to do a spoof ad, "Got Metal?" Maybe I'll meme it.

See you on Sunday for the WEEKEND WRAP.

At the Close, Thursday, December 11, 2025:
DOW: 48,704.01, +646.26 (+1.34%)
NASDAQ: 23,593.86, -60.30 (-0.25%)
S&P 500: 6,901.00, +14.32 (+0.21%)
NYSE Composite: 22,114.42, +181.11 (+0.83%)



Thursday, December 11, 2025

Crossing Out Pandemic Era Prices; Fed Cuts FF Rate, Re-Starts QE, Buying Bills; Oracle Reports, Stock Tanks

In horse racing handicapping, the most astute observers of form, pace, and condition will often take an unusually poor performance by an otherwise dependable steed and "put a line through it," withdrawing a bad race from the overall past performance presentation.

That approach would probably fit well within the scope of long-term investors as it pertains to the pandemic or "covid" era from February, 2020 and - depending on the particular asset - anywhere from June, 2020 to March, 2021. Taking a "before and after" snapshot of the period in between given dates, eliminates the aberrant period in which asset values were whipsawed lower and then back higher, producing a continuity in pricing that is at once more realistic and more reliable for assessing true valuations.

While it may be futile to point this out to the horde of momentum-chasing droids that populate the current investor class since few bother to look back five years, much less five weeks, when performing due diligence, if they bother with that at all. Nonetheless, smoothing out bumps and grinds along the pathways of stocks, bonds, commodities and their varied derivatives is part of the rigor of value investing. It's why moving averages are important.

For those not desirous of a deep look at the past, it's useful to note that most five year charts now, at long last, do not cover the pandemic era at all. By December, 2020, most of the financial horrors had already been relegated to a fresh dustbin of history, though effects on the human psyche and physical health persisted longer, some even to this day. One cannot easily draw a line through personal tragedy or long term illness and death has its own black line, drawn with a permanent marker.

The passage of time and the wisdom of charts has done some of the work for investors by taking out some of the bad experience, but, five years of past performances may be suitable for a seven-year-old racehorse, it's a little short on the history of companies, especially those like Dow stocks that have been around for decades. Well, some of them, at least.

Those bearing recency bias may want to perform a similar line-out on the tariff tantrum from April through July of 2025. It was also an aberration that should not be included in 52-week high or low measurements. All assets, classes, and stocks are different, so employing sound judgement on such matters is a requirement.

Looking at more recent developments, the FOMC did what everybody expected and cut the federal funds target rate 0.25%, to 3.50-3.75%, the lowest in three years. The Fed also restarted QE, announcing that they would begin buying $40 billion worth of short-dated treasury bills immediately at Chairman Powell's press conference following the policy statement. Claiming that the purchase of short-term bills is "not QE", this latest liquidity push is not explicit in the official statements, but rather referenced in the implementation note, directing the Open Market Desk at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to:

Increase the System Open Market Account holdings of securities through purchases of Treasury bills and, if needed, other Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less to maintain an ample level of reserves.

Roll over at auction all principal payments from the Federal Reserve's holdings of Treasury securities. Reinvest all principal payments from the Federal Reserve's holdings of agency securities into Treasury bills.

Thus, there are no reins on the NY Fed. They are free to purchase T-bills and roll over expiring bills, notes, and bonds into exclusively bills.

This indicates, as none other than "Big Short" Michael Burry opines that such a move shows that the banking sector is stressed, not "stable" as many pundits would like to reference its current condition. (Editor's Note: Oddly enough, after clicking the link to the story above, Money Daily was prompted to log into its msn account, with the message, "since you are accessing sensitive information..." How about that? Now, financial information concerning Michael Burry is now sensitive?)

The next FOMC meetings are scheduled for January 27-28 and March 17-18. The Fed made no reference toward cutting rates any further.

All of this just helped silver bump a lttle higher. With the U.S. stock markets open in half an hour, silver continues to make new all-time highs, Silver hit a high of $62.93 overnight and is holding above $62 currently. Gold is steady at $4,219, and looking to advance.

Stock futures are lower, with Dow futures right at breakeven, NASDAQ futures off 147 points and S&P futures down 25.

Oracle (ORCL) reported before the open. The stock is tanking in the pre-market, down more than 13%. Not to worry, the U.S. government owns 10% of the company. Yeah, how's that working out?

Trouble's brewing. Hurry, Santa! We've all been nice this year!

At the Close, Wednesday, December 10, 2025:
Dow: 48,057.75, +497.46 (+1.05%)
NASDAQ: 23,654.16, +77.67 (+0.33%)
S&P 500: 6,886.68, +46.17 (+0.67%)
NYSE Composite: 21,933.31, +278.52 (+1.29%)



Wednesday, December 10, 2025

Silver Price Riggers Swamped, Overwhelmed as the End of Debt-Based Fiat Currency Accelerates; Fed Rate Cut Expected at 2:00 pm ET

Accolades are in order for the silver price suppressors concerning Tuesday's trading. Huzzah! All praise to the riggers!

As is their usual mode of operation, in the overnight trade of December 8, leading to the morning of December 9, the usual suspects managed to smash the silver price down to $57.54. Hours later, during regular trading in New York, the price of an ounce of silver had reached the unprecedented all-time high of $60.88 in the spot market.

The price suppression cartel that operates between the United States and England has been fully broken and defeated. Within the past month alone, the price of silver has increased more than 21%. Over six months, the rise has been more than 66%, and year-to-date silver has achieved what many long-term holders of precious metals thought to be impossible: the price of silver has advanced some 109%, affirming that whatever mechanisms the New York to London fixes, spoofs, and unconscionable suppression tactics have been undertaken have failed, and failed miserably.

Implications to global economics are profound and only beginning to be understood. Silver's rising price represents a wholesale repudiation of Western economic hegemony and a radical shift from derivative pricing to physical, not just in the United States and Europe, but around the world.

A day or so ago, Fearless Rick watched a video produced by Chris Martenson, accompanied by Paul Kiker, near the end of which both presenters were dumbfounded as to why central banks were so intent on keeping the price of silver suppressed. Neither could come up with a good reason. On Tuesday, Rick posted a reply on the youtube page, republished here, which answers their question rather succinctly:

To Chris and Paul: I just wanted to offer my opinion on why central banks and major economies like the US and (ahem) England want to keep the price of silver down is because of one simple reason: It's MONEY, just like gold, and central bankers with the ability to conjure fiat currency out of thin air DO NOT APPRECIATE COMPETITION. The suppression of silver didn't happen when silver was taken out of circulation in 1965 in the US. It began much further back, in 1873, when central banks sought to remove the bi-metallic standard from with the U.S. and elsewhere and make gold the prime financial asset with the coinage act of 1973. What became known as the "Crime of '73" demonetized silver and facilitated the suffering of farmers and common people in the United States.

I have written on the subject many times on my website, https://dtmagazine.com. You can go and read my assessments of why central bankers hate silver more than gold or read many other articles around the internet. I'll certainly be writing more about banking and silver as long as I can, and actually featured silver on the money page of December's idleguy.com (https://idleguy.com/122025/8money.php).

There are far-reaching ramifications concerning silver that will come to actualization in the months and years ahead, the most powerful of which will likely be a return to sane and historic gold:silver ratio of what I believe will eventually be 10:1. By putting silver in proper perspective relative to gold and the US$, much of the world will experience prosperity as they never have before. Imagine the populations of India, China, much of the Middle East, Africa, South America and, of course, in developed nations as well, being pulled from poverty just by the men act of silver being finally recognized for its monetary potential. You can pay attention to this world-shattering event as it occurs or deny it. The choice is yours. Good day and good luck.

It's a good thing Money Daily copy/pasted the comment, because, like most of Fearless Rick's commentary, it was quickly removed (We'll repost it, again, and again, and again).

As far as the gold:silver ratio returning to the natural level of 10:1 is concerned, that development may take years, or could happen overnight, should a major economic power - India, China, Russia, Indonesia or even Saudi Arabia, or all of them - officially peg silver to gold at a 10:1 ratio. Not that it may happen, but the likelihood of it happening grows significantly closer as the ratio, even with the COMEX, CME, and the LBMA squirming to retain control continue to exist.

As of Tuesday evening, the ratio has fallen to its lowest level since 2021, 69.43, and it is likely to decline even further. Just a few weeks ago that ratio was above 84. The movement should not be easily disregarded as it represents the initial thrust in what figures to be a long-term trend. There's no doubt that the regime of fractional reserve, fiat debt-based money is nearing an end. Silver may very well be the vehicle that accelerates or completes the process.

With the stock market opening in about 30 minutes, the price of silver is holding around $60.80 after hitting a record high of $61.64 overnight in the spot market. Whatever techniques the riggers are using, they aren't working very well presently.

The big deal on Wednesday will be the conclusion of the final FOMC meeting of the year. At 2:00 pm ET the FOMC will unveil what figures to be a 25 basis point cut to the federal funds rate, from 3.75-3.50% down to 3.50-3.25%. Chairman Jerome Powell will hold the customary press conference a half hour after the announcement, and FOMC members will reveal their economic projections.

Stock futures are flat, bitcoin is hovering around the $92,000 mark and WTI crude oil is up 13 cents, at $58.38.

At the Close, Tuesday, December 9, 2025:
Dow: 47,560.29, -179.03 (-0.38%)
NASDAQ: 23,576.49, +30.58 (+0.13%)
S&P 500: 6,840.51, -6.00 (-0.09%)
NYSE Composite: 21,654.78, -48.41 (-0.22%)



Tuesday, December 9, 2025

Will the Fed's Hawkish Rate Cut Stop the Rally in Stocks?; Health Insurance Tax Credits Remain Unresolved, Another Government Shutdown Possible

There's been a lot of talk lately about a "hawkish" rate cut about to be promoted by the Federal Reserve's FOMC on Wednesday and this has left markets - stocks, bonds, and commodities - a little bit confused. While the widely-expected 25 basis point slash to the federal funds target rate is, in isolation, dovish, rhetoric from the Fed governors, regional presidents, and Chairman Powell himself may lean slightly to the rational side that believes inflation is still not fully under control nor is the base economy in dire enough straits to automatically assume the Fed's path is toward further easing.

Chairman Powell is likely to touch on these topics at his post-policy press conference and his points may be well-grounded, though, in the absence or delays of the usual government reports isn't going to clarify matters for the Fed's position one way or another. For instance, November PPI has now been delayed for release until January 14, the government shutdown being blamed for the delay by the bean-counters at the BLS.

Investopedia has published a list of reports that have already been delayed with the new release dates and some that have yet to be rescheduled. The somewhat long list itself is now five days old; some of the dates have been changed, again; and the lack of data implies that the Fed is "flying blind" no matter which way their economic bias trends. The lack of data also provides a potential escape hatch for any miscalculations the Fed might encounter. It wouldn't surprise anybody to hear strained apologies from Fed officials in February or March about higher prices, or low employment, or any number of economic pitfalls that may occur before, during, or after January 31, when the funding approved to end the shutdown three weeks ago runs out again.

There's every possibility that the government will shut down again, as the core issue of extending or rescinding health insurance tax credits remains unresolved with congressional holidays soon to commence. Both houses will be on holiday from December 20 through January 4. It's true that the people most responsible for the government shutdown, and lack of, or delayed, data releases are the 535 members of congress who seem unable to agree on anything beyond support for Ukraine and their own salaries. As a whole, the Senators and Representatives have been largely mute when it comes to resolving core issues and they're nowhere near consensus or compromise on the main stumbling block.

In the meantime, many Americans face a December 15 deadline to choose an insurance provider. Congress has once again left them in the lurch, without a clear decision. Many Americans may choose to opt out of choosing altogether. Premiums and deductibles on the available plans remain sky-high and congress has forwarded no guidance going forward. It's almost as if the shutdown, ostensibly forced by Democrats opposed to the cancellation of Obamacare subsidies (by Republicans in the One Big Beautiful Bill) was all for naught and the country will be forced back into indecision and shutdown again by February 1.

Inaction at the congressional level provides the Federal Reserve plenty of cover for whatever monetary policies they prefer to promote. "Don't blame us, it was them," is likely to be the phrase rising up the unaccountability chart with a bullet in early 2026 as the economy suffers, people are forced into buying things - health insurance - they don't want or can’t afford, and the media spin gyrates out of control.

What the FOMC will accomplish on Wednesday, in association with Jerome Powell and others' jawboning immediately afterwards, has all the elements of a bait-and-switch. The Fed will cut the target rate down to 3.50-3.75%, that's a given, but the talk will be about further rate cuts, in January and beyond, which the fed mouthpieces are certain to downplay. In other words, after this cut, no more, and maybe not for a long time, so you'll get some relief, but there's no guarantee we will do more of the same. In essence, the Fed is cutting rates rather reluctantly while implying that there will be a rough road ahead and they'll be standing back and watching instead of acting.

As the Wednesday 2:00 pm ET date with destiny approaches, markets remain unresolved and taking bites of reality into account. Stocks turned lower on Monday, and stock futures are heading lower across the board this morning. Actions of the Federal Reserve don't occur in a vacuum. There are more issues surrounding the economy of the U.S. and the rest of the world to consider. The unwinding of the Yen carry trade is becoming a hot-button issue, the AI spending spree is coming under considerable scrutiny as are most government policies. Reality rears its ugly head again and more people are paying attention, noticing that government and media characterizations of the state of affairs doesn't quite jibe with what they're experiencing on a day-to-day basis.

A Santa Rally may be in the offing come bonus time, but there's a good chance it will occur at levels well below what's current.

After what looks to be a "hawkish rate cut" might the next move on the markets be one of Orwellian design, like "stocks rally lower?"

At the Close, Monday, December 8, 2025:
Dow: 47,739.32, -215.67 (-0.45%)
NASDAQ: 23,545.90, -32.22 (-0.14%)
S&P 500: 6,846.51, -23.89 (-0.35%)
NYSE Composite: 21,703.20, -106.88 (-0.49%)



Sunday, December 7, 2025

WEEKEND WRAP: Gold:Silver Ratio at 72, Lowest in Four Years; FOMC Rate Cut Expectations Skew Yields; Stocks Playing Waiting Game; Gas Prices Lowest in Five Years

The main focus of the past week, and something that has captured the attention of not a small slice of the investing world, continued to be the silver gambit, as the shiny precious metal continued to make new all-time highs the week following the still mysterious CME global shutdown. There continue to be reverberations from that seminal event, which may, over time, be looked upon as a epochal turning point in global economics. While there are plenty of people who may casually disregard the event and take without any grains of salt the official story of a cooling systems failure, the lack of any official government investigation leads on to conclude that there is actually something to see there, but the insiders don't want you to know what it is.

Stocks languished as bonds flourished, the rate cut odds providing ample rationale to flee from risk. Despite the usual suppression operations, gold and silver exhibited more than usual volatility. Pressure to the upside in prices is obvious and ominous at the same time.

The week ahead will be mostly about the Fed and the rate cut on Wednesday. In particular, it can be safely assumed that markets were playing the waiting game the past week, anticipating the all-powerful wizard of OZ FOMC emitting a bolt of lightning to shock and awe all participants.

Stocks

Stocks wasted everybody's time, with the operripe NASDAQ leading the way with a gain of 0.91%. The other indices were up much less than that, with the NYSE Composite actually registering a loss on the week. Equity investors are desperate for a Santa Claus rally, which could come in the form of a 0.25% rate cut at the FOMC meeting this coming week, on Tuesday and Wednesday, December 9 and 10, the latter date saved for the 2:00 pm ET official rate policy announcement.

While the expected drop in the federal funds rate from 4.00-4.25% to 3.75-4.00% may be good for stocks, it's probably going to be better for gold, silver, and possibly bitcoin, though the crypto king has been in a prolonged slump since early October and may be unable to convince enough suckers of its fabulous, long-term potential as a monetary replacement for the U.S. dollar (dreaming).

The stock market remains very close to all-time highs, and one wonders how long investors will hold onto the idea of seven stocks holding up the entire market structure on the promises of an AI revolution. The narrative has grown thin as the big players - Amazon, Google, Apple, Meta, Nvidia, etc. - are throwing hundreds of billions of dollars to build out data centers and power stations without much in the way of positive return being demonstrated.

AI, while it is useful in many functions, is not in itself a revolutionary development. It is something akin to a much faster search engine, a super-quick graphic card, and a relatively erudite wordsmith. It's main attraction is its ability to parse data at lightning speeds, which requires intense amounts of computing power. Applications for business and industry are paramount, but the promulgation of smaller, well-defined small language models (SMEs) may prove eventually to be cheaper and of more efficient use than the race toward large language models (LLMs) sought by the mega-tech companies.

As with every incident of technological advancement, there exists small start-ups and mid-cap companies whose use and advancement of the technology may produce returns that dwarf those of their gigantic rivals. Identifying those companies poised to benefit from further advancement in AI (which should be eventually deflationary when brought to scale) would be a worthwhile undertaking for the keenest of stock pickers.

Since Money Daily is not in the business of giving investment advice, we'll leave it at that, offering direction instead.

As the year of 2025 draws to a conclusion, stocks appear to have locked in rather solid gains. With just 17 trading days left, the Dow is up 12.73% year-to-date, the S&P up 16.81%, and the NASDAQ up 22.10%.

The NYSE Composite is up 14.21% on the year, and the Dow Jones Transportation Average lags, at +8.10%. Without sufficient catalysts to move stocks much higher, there's a good possibility for pullback on profit taking. There remains more than ample rationale to exit with profits before the calendar turns, with tax implications of this year and fourth quarter earnings results ahead in the new year.

While the top may already be in for this leg of the rally, nobody's yet to ring a bell, so, as anyone with two eyes is aware, this bubble may not be anywhere near bursting and a ride higher through the holiday season remains the general sentiment, and deservedly so, as the stock market usually performs rather well in December.

Individuals and institutions are likely to make their own choices based upon their investment regimens, which obviously have wide variety. Up, down, or mixed, seems to be the state of play.

Treasury Yield Curve Rates

Date 1 Mo 1.5 mo 2 Mo 3 Mo 4 Mo 6 Mo 1 Yr
10/31/2025 4.06 4.02 4.04 3.89 3.87 3.79 3.70
11/07/2025 4.01 3.96 3.98 3.92 3.83 3.76 3.63
11/14/2025 4.04 4.02 4.01 3.95 3.88 3.80 3.70
11/21/2025 4.03 4.01 4.00 3.90 3.84 3.75 3.62
11/28/2025 4.05 3.97 3.99 3.88 3.86 3.74 3.61
12/05/2025 3.82 3.78 3.77 3.71 3.73 3.68 3.61

Date 2 Yr 3 Yr 5 Yr 7 Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr 30 Yr
10/31/2025 3.60 3.60 3.71 3.89 4.11 4.65 4.67
11/07/2025 3.55 3.57 3.67 3.87 4.11 4.68 4.70
11/14/2025 3.62 3.61 3.74 3.92 4.14 4.73 4.74
11/21/2025 3.51 3.50 3.62 3.82 4.06 4.67 4.71
11/28/2025 3.47 3.49 3.59 3.78 4.02 4.62 4.67
12/05/2025 3.56 3.59 3.72 3.90 4.14 4.75 4.79

Fed speakers are in "quiet mode" prior to this week's FOMC meeting (Tuesday-Wednesday) as the 25 basis point cut seems virtually assured, especially given recent employment data. In the absence of the usual Non-farm Payroll data from the BLS, November's ADP report of a 45,000 jobs loss for the month sufficed to move the needle sufficiently in the direction of easier money.

Bond vigilantes weren't exactly sold on the idea, sending longer maturities higher over the week while the short end of the curve was brought lower. Yields on one-month bills declined a solid 23 basis points with the remainder giving up less until evening out at the one-year level, rising on maturities beyond that. The 30-year yield was the highest in three months (4.86% on September 4). While no cause for immediate alarm, the rise on longer-dated maturities signals that the general market still considers inflation an issue and the general tenor of U.S. fiscal policy for too loosey-goosey, for lack of a better term.

Spreads blew out, with the full spectrum (30 days - 30 years) reaching an unprecedented extreme of +97 as the polar fixtures moved in opposite directions. 2s-10s were better behaved, reaching 58, a three-month high, indicative of the many stresses in the funding mechanisms for U.S. fiscal profligacy.

From a near-term perspective, the sudden jerking of the entire curve, lower on one end, higher on the other, may seem troubling, but overall, a steepening should prove beneficial to the government as it attempts to reign in its extravagance, at least at the margins. Not to be concerned, congress will almost certainly find ways to overspend borrowed money until, well, something breaks, ostensibly, U.S. taxpayers.

Spreads:

2s-10s
2025
1/3: +32
1/10: +37
1/17: +34
1/24: +36
1/31: +36
2/7: +20
2/14: +21
2/21: +23
2/28: +25
3/7: +33
3/14: +29
3/21: +31
3/28: +38
4/4: +33
4/11: +52
4/17: +53
4/25: +55
5/2: +50
5/9: +49
5/16: +45
5/23: +51
5/30: +52
6/6: +48
6/13: +45
6/20: +48
6/27: +56
7/3: +47
7/11: +53
7/18: +56
7/25: +49
8/1: +54
8/8: +51
8/15: +58
8/22: +58
8/29: +64
9/5: +59
9/12: +50
9/19: +57
9/26: +57
10/3: +45
10/10: +53
10/17: +56
10/24: +54
10/31: +51
11/7: +56
11/14: +52
11/21: +55
11/28: +55
12/5: +58

Full Spectrum (30-days - 30-years)
2025
1/3: +38
1/10: +54
1/17: +41
1/24: +40
1/31: +36
2/7: +32
2/14: +32
2/21: +31
2/28: +13
3/7: +24
3/14: +25
3/21: +23
3/28: +26
4/4: +5
4/11: +38
4/17: +44
4/25: +40
5/2: +41
5/9: +46
5/16: +52
5/23: +68
5/30: +59
6/6: +69
6/13: +67
6/20: +69
6/27: +66
7/3: +51
7/11: +59
7/18: +65
7/25: +55
8/1: +32
8/8: +37
8/15: +44
8/22: +41
8/29: +51
9/5: +49
9/12: +40
9/19: +54
9/26: +55
10/3: +47
10/10: +43
10/17: +42
10/24: +48
10/31: +61
11/7: +69
11/14: +70
11/21: +68
11/28: +62
12/5: +97

Oil/Gas

WTI crude closed out the week at $60.14, departing from a two-week skid into the $50s, based primarily on what speculators must have considered to be oversold conditions, given that the latest round of sanctions propose to bring the evil Russian empire of crude oil to its knees and President Trump's 28, or 24, or 18-point peace plan were a sure step in the right direction towards an end of hostilities in Ukraine. What the half-hearted proposal did was provide cover for the failures of U.S. foreign policy, another short-term victory for the war promoters of Europe and the deep state in America, and more time for Russia's military to advance along the battle lines.

Such is the kind of lunacy effective in energy markets and the idle minds on Capitol Hill and in the White House. 18 rounds of sanctions designed to damage Russia haven't worked, but the 19th surely will. At this juncture, Senator Graham's proposal for even more extreme sanctions on Russia and its trading partners appear to have broad support, since everything up to this point hasn't worked. Indeed, THIS TIME will be different. Promise!

The U.S. national average for gas at the pump fell to $2.92, the lowest price in roughly five years and six cents lower than the prior week, according to Gasbuddy.com. Gas prices should continue to decline over the near term and through winter which is nothing but good news for stretched consumers and businesses.

California remains the highest in the lower 48 states, at $4.45 per gallon, down 10 cent on the week and 21 cents over the past three weeks, followed by Washington ($4.17), the two constituting the membership of the lonely $4+ club. Oregon ($3.69), was down six cents. The lowest prices remain in the Southeast, with Oklahoma checking in near the lowest price in over a year, $2.30, another radical drop of 15 cents just this week. Colorado ($2.39) and Texas ($2.42) were next. Arkansas ($2.46) and Mississippi ($2.48) and Louisiana ($2.49) follow. The remaining Southeast states are all below $2.76 with the exception of Florida ($3.91) down 20 cents in two weeks time.

In the Northeast, prices remain elevated, though at the early stages of what appears to be a general decline. Delaware ($2.89) was the lowest in the region, joined by New Hampshire, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Maryland under $3.00, with Pennsylvania ($3.17) steady as the highest. Vermont ($3.12) and New York ($3.09) following lower.

In the midwest region, where the price relief has been significant, Illinois ($3.04) was the only state above $3.00. At the low end were Colorado ($2.39) and Iowa ($2.56).

Sub-$3.00 gas was reported in fully 34 states, a gain of three from last week and eight over the past two weeks.

Bitcoin

This week: $90,860.37
Last week: $91,709.19
2 weeks ago: $87,373.34
6 months ago: $105,525.30
One year ago: $99,819.01
Five years ago: $18,810.76

Bitcoin has recovered from a low of around $81,000 on November 22. It remains 27% or lower beneath its all-time high of October 7 ($124.310.60). A purchase of bitcoin five years ago still yields a five-bagger. It was nearly a seven-bagger two months ago. It doesn't take much in the way of fundamental analysis to conclude that bitcoin's current path is reminiscent of that of the period from mid-November, 2021 to the end of January, 2022, when it lost nearly $30,000, being cut almost in half, on its way from the high above $64,000 to a low in the $16,000 range, a roughly 75% decline.

The current trajectory puts bitcoin at $30,000 within a year's time, not the $200,000 or $1 million suggested by the likes of Anthony Scaramucci or Michael Saylor, whose business, Strategy (MSTR), will be pretty much bankrupted with such a decline. Charts are charts and cycles are cycles. Bitcoin cheerleaders haven't had much in the way of good things to say about crypto the past few months except that it's cheap, which is like saying the Colorado Rockies will probably win more games next season (maybe).

Precious Metals

Gold:Silver Ratio: 72.01; last week: 74.80

Futures, per COMEX continuous contracts:

Gold price 11/7: $4,007.80
Gold price 11/14: $4,084.40
Gold price 11/21: $4,099.20
Gold price 11/28: $4,256.40
Gold price 12/5: $4,227.70

Silver price 11/7: $48.22
Silver price 11/14: $50.40
Silver price 11/21: $50.33
Silver price 11/28: $57.08
Silver price 12/5: $58.80

SPOT:
(stockcharts.com)
Gold 11/7: $3999.89
Gold 11/14: $4,080.00
Gold 11/21: $4,063.98
Gold 11/28: $4216.71
Gold 12/5: $4,196.63

Silver 11/7: $48.33
Silver 11/14: $50.50
Silver 11/21: $49.97
Silver 11/28: $56.37
Silver 12/5: $58.28

Friday's closing futures price for gold on the COMEX is kind of a sick joke, considering that gold futures hit a high of $4,292.30 on Monday, December 1, and $4,279.50 on Friday, December 5. The gold price suppressors remain fully in control in terms of the gold market, with central banks worldwide more than willing to accede to their pricing scheme as they continue to accumulate the Tier 1 asset of choice.

What is not so funny is the loss of control of silver futures, that metric being led by physical spot pricing in the real world. With the March contract as the front end, silver futures are back in contango, though the highest price on the futures chain of $60.69 one year out (December 2026) does not reflect very much of the spot market supply side reality. Industrial demand, increasing investment interest, and a severe supply shortage continue to pressure prices higher and the gold:silver ratio lower, to a level not seen since July, 2021, as the world was emerging from the brief and painful COVID experience.

The covid slump, which sent the GSR down to a low of 65.41 in February, 2021, was neither very deep nor lasting. Gold and silver prices quickly recovered, with gold the leading edge. This was nothing compared to the post-GFC level of 31.60 posted in February 2011, as silver skyrocketed ahead of all other assets out of the slump, reaching its highest prices since 1980.

From an historical perspective, the lowest levels of the gold:silver ratio were in 1968 and 1980, when this metric was measured in the teens. In between, through the 1970s, the GSR gyrated around the low to mid-30s. This period, post-Vietnam and also post-Bretton Woods, was a time of relative peace and prosperity for much of the world. Once the mechanisms were fully in place for price suppression of precious metals, the proponents of such found it easier to control the price of silver that that of gold, the former being a much smaller market. Of course, this period was subsequent to silver being demonetized in the United States (In 1965 silver coins were removed from circulation and in 1968 silver certificates were no longer redeemable for physical metal.) and antecedent to the infamous Hunt Brothers' escapades in the silver market in 1979 and 1980.

Conditions have changed dramatically since then. In the 50+ years since the 70s, the United States became the world's greatest debtor nation, arguably the world's foremost military aggressor and global hegemon, and today is experiencing a decline in financial and political dominance as the world becomes increasingly fractured and polarized. The main industrial use of silver was in film processing in the 70s and 80s. Today, it's solar energy, EV technology, and military manufacturing, much greater use.

What is also propelling the price of silver higher and the gold:silver ratio lower is the increased interest in silver as a monetary metal. It was 60 years ago that silver was used as a common currency, a medium of exchange, as money in not just the United States, but in many countries around the world. While silver is no longer accepted as currency or legal tender in most of the world, that is changing rapidly in major economies such as China, India, and even the United States.

The Sound Money Defense League and Money Metals produce the Sound Money Index which rates the individual states on various criteria in terms of the free use of gold and silver as money. On April 1, 2026, Indian citizens will have the ability to use silver coins and jewelry as collateral for loans, and China, which maintained a silver standard until 1935, has a long history with silver as money.

While silver minted as currency ended abruptly in the mid-20th century, the minting of silver coins for investment purposes has continued uninterrupted. From Canadian Maple Leafs, U.S. Silver Eagles, Australian Kangaroos, Cinese Pandas, and Mexican Libertads, the minting of silver coins of high (.999) purity has proceeded uninterrupted.

Those who believe that a return to a 10:1, 15:1 or 20:1 gold:silver ratio simply don't know their history. It has only been in the past 150 years (essentially since the "Crime of 1873") that silver has not held a tight peg to gold. Recent developments, such as India maximizing silver loans at a 10:1 ratio to gold (1 kilogram gold to 10 kilograms silver) and the Dubai Bank of Bullion specifying minimum purchases of 1 Oz of Gold, Platinum or Palladium and 10 Oz of Silver as minimum purchases, suggest a stealth reordering of the gold:silver ratio.

While the gold:silver ratio appears to be beginning a trend lower, getting back to historical standards of 10:1 ro 20:1 would likely take decades, or, it could happen in the blink of an eye, taking just one populous country, such as India or China, to formally declare a gold:silver ratio for a global reset to occur. The arbitrage possibilities would be so enormous that most, if not all, other countries would soon fall in line with the new standard. It is something that all siver and gold investors should carefully consider.

In the meantime, silver continues its recent acceleration over gold. Year-to-date, silver is up 101.95% to gold's rise of 60.66%. In just the past six months, silver is up a whopping 60% compared to gold's rather "pedestrian" 26%, and the meteoric rise of silver may be just beginning. The gold:silver ratio can drop rapidly. As it is, it has fallen from over 100 in May to its current level of 72. That's 30 points in just eight months. If the trend continues, imagine where it might be in five years and what the price of both gold and silver might be. Estimates range from the reasonable to the absurd, but the numbers bandied about recently focus around $10,000 for gold and $700 for silver, a GSR around 14. Over the near term, $5000 gold and $100 silver (50:1) does not seem far-fetched, even as early as the coming new year.

Here are the most recent prices for common one ounce gold and silver items sold on eBay (free shipping included, numismatics excluded):

Item/Price Low High Average Median
1 oz silver coin: 59.50 69.95 66.23 67.48
1 oz silver bar: 62.00 73.95 66.62 66.43
1 oz gold coin: 4,221.99 4,518.12 4,400.19 4,389.92
1 oz gold bar: 4,338.76 4,477.78 4,400.74 4,386.88

The Single Ounce Silver Market Price Benchmark (SOSMPB) delivered, for the second straight week, an impressive gain, to $66.69, up $3.75 cents from the November 30 price of $62.94 per troy ounce. The small-denomination, physical market continues to add high premia over spot and derivative market pricing.

WEEKEND WRAP

As legend goes, the eminent J.P. Morgan, when queried on whether he thought markets will go up or down, paused a moment and said, as sagaciously as possible, "markets will fluctuate." That, friends, is a truism that should always be top of mind when making any kind of investment decision.

At the Close, Friday, December 5, 2025:
Dow: 47,954.99, +104.05 (+0.22%)
NASDAQ: 23,578.13, +72.99 (+0.31%)
S&P 500: 6,870.40, +13.28 (+0.19%)
NYSE Composite: 21,810.07, -25.72 (-0.12%)

For the Week:
Dow: +238.57 (+0.50%)
NASDAQ: +212.44 (+0.91%)
S&P 500: +21.31 (+0.31%)
NYSE Composite: -14.60 (-0.07%)
Dow Transports: +597.31 (+3.60%)



Disclaimer: Information disseminated on this site should not be construed as investment advice. Downtown Magazine Inc., Money Daily and it's owners, affiliates and/or employees are not investment advisors and do not offer specific investment advice. All investments have risk. You should consult a professional investment advisor or stock broker or use your individual judgement when making investment decisions. By viewing this site, you hold harmless Downtown Magazine Inc., Money Daily, its owners, affiliates and employees against any and all liability. Copyright 2025, Downtown Magazine Inc., all rights reserved.

Saturday, December 6, 2025

Unraveling the $1.972 Billion Silver Trade That May or May Not Have Happened Amid the CME Shutdown; The Possibility of a Gold:Silver Ratio at 10:1

Editor's Note: While trying to reclaim a little bit of sanity as my post, "It's my Birthday, So you Better Read This" was maliciously shadow-banned by the usual platforms (probably just a little too honest), some details concerning the mysterious 10-hour CME shutdown Thanksgiving evening into Black Friday were emerging from a variety of sources. Nothing you read below has been verified, since the principal parties aren't about to spill the beans on what actually happened, but, speculation points toward a major event that has been tucked away for safe keeping by the financial deep state. - Fearless Rick

The 10-hour shutdown of the CME, the world's major derivatives platform, late on the night of Thanksgiving and extending into Black Friday morning in the U.S., continues to raise eyebrows, though it is almost universally accepted that the cause was not "cooling issues" as the official story wants the world to believe.

The most likely cause was a large purchase of physical silver, the buyer (or buyers) standing for delivery and the contract seller (ostensibly a short seller) failing to deliver

At about the 5:15 mark of the video below, Mario Innecco begins to talk about 34 million ounces of silver (6,800 contracts) being bought by supposed Mideast Sovereign Wealth Funds or cental banks. That's about $1,972 billion worth of silver that the customer was standing for delivery on and maybe did or did not receive, but that's just the tip of the silver iceberg that is threatening the Western economies and confidence in the institutions of the CME, COMEX, Globex, the LBMA, indeed, the pillars of derivative trading, the the main suppressors of gold and silver prices for the past 50 years.

Vince Lanci's analysis via the Wednesday, Decemebr 3, Arcadia Economics' Money Morning Report "SHOCKING SILVER NEWS: JP Morgan Transfers 13.4 Million Ounces To Eligible During CME Shutdown" provides further analysis and speculation to what happened on Thanksgiving evening and Black Friday morning at the CME. Lanci's reporting also verifies JP Morgan moving 13.4 million ounces from registered (available for delivery) to eligible (customer owned, not available for delivery).

Taking the gist of the two video postings together, a story begins to emerge. Of course, nothing is verified. It is still speculation, but, perhaps, just prior to the shutdown, the buyer of 6,800 silver contracts (5,000 ounces each) stood for delivery. Frantic, panicked, whoever wrote the contracts (could be one entity, or many) informed the CME that they didn't have the silver to satisfy delivery or didn't want to part with the metal.

It would appear that the writer of the contracts in question was most likely one bullion bank, possible the COMEX London vaults, a large broker-dealer or a combination of such. In an event that would shatter confidence - failing to deliver on nearly $2 billion in silver - CME officials decided to shut down the entire exchange, effectively covering the tracks of the silver trade (or non-trade).

During the shutdown, as Lanci assiduously points out, negotiations likely took place, an agreement was reached, and that would partially explain JP Morgan's action, essentially, covering part of the purchase by reclassifying 13.4 million ounces. For illustration purposes, suppose JP Morgan was made part of the deal, instructed to cover part of the purchase via accounting. In essence, the 13.4 million ounces that were available prior to the shutdown became the property of the buyer, for delivery at some agreed-upon date. (BOLO for planes laden with 1,000-ounce silver bars leaving New York and headed for Dubai)

Digging a little deeper, the lie of the "cooling issue" story and the truth about what really happened begins to crystallize. About a week before Thanksgiving, President Trump welcomed Saudi Prince, Mohammed bin Salman, to the White House for extensive meetings attempting to repair the badly frayed U.S.-Saudi relationship. Desperate to make amends, Trump, who, as everybody knows, is the most fabulous, greatest-ever deal-maker in the history of the known universe, gave bin Salman just about anything and everything he wanted, including the purchase of F-35 fighter jets wihtout the caveat of normalization of relations between the Kingdom of Saud and Israel.

Just before the Saudi visit, on or about November 11, the United States declared silver a critical mineral.

The Saudis, being not the least misinformed concerning geopolitics and money, might have decided that silver at $57 to $58 per ounce might offer an opportunity to trip up the United States and cripple the corrupt Western derivative markets, while at the same time grabbing hold of a valuable asset that is likely going to triple in value over the next 12-18 months.

After all, at the Bank of Bullion in Dubai, on their FAQs page, the answer to the question:

What is the minimum Quantity of gold and other precious metals I can buy from Bank of Bullion?
is
1 Oz of Gold, Platinum or Palladium. 10 Oz of Silver

For reference, one ounce of gold is roughly $4,250. 10 ounces of silver is only about $570.00. Why not 75, 80, or 100 ounces of silver, which would be roughly equivalent to the minimum capital limit on gold?

This aligns with India's recent directive to allow citizens and businesses to borrow against their gold and silver, their minimums being 1 Kilogram of gold or 10 Kilograms of silver.

The world order is being turned upside-down and it may take just one big trade to completely flip the scales.

Markets are open for Friday's trading.

Good luck.

At the Close, Thursday, November 4, 2025:
Dow: 47,850.94, -31.96 (-0.07%)
NASDAQ: 23,505.14, +51.04 (+0.22%)
S&P 500: 6,857.12, +7.40 (+0.11%)
NYSE Composite: 21,835.79, +30.39 (+0.14%)



Thursday, December 4, 2025

It's My Birthday, So You Better Read This

Hey, today's my birthday, so I might go off the rails a bit here.

One of the biggest problems in the world today is that of political and economic leadership failing to acknowledge their own failures.

Manifested in various schemes and sub-routines, like sending a real estate developer and your son-in-law to negotiate peace with Russia over Ukraine, or claiming covid vaccines are safe and effective while people collapse right after receiving the "jab", the willful blindness of people in leadership positions is stunning.

One activity that constantly comes into perspective is the decades-long suppression of gold and silver by minions in the COMEX-LBMA-ESF cartel. These delusional folks actually believe they are doing some good with their naked shorts, spoofing, and assorted market manipulations by sending the price of silver a buck or two lower, or holding the price of gold right at some pre-determined level, satisfying their need for control and influence.

All they're actually doing is delaying the inevitable collapse of fiat currencies and the return of honest money devoid of counter-party risk.

Europeans are particularly adept at self-deception and delusion. Many heads of state within the EU - at least the important ones, France and Germany - must have to wake up every morning and convince themselves that Russia is about to invade Europe and that Ukraine is effectively holding them back. Macron in France and Merz in Germany are primary exemplars of delusional behavior. The U.S. has developed its own brand of pseudo-realism, thanks in part to the fall of journalistic standards, large swaths of heavily-controlled and coerced populations, and just plain stupidity.

It began with Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi, in a manner that was equally hilarious and disturbing at the same time. Biden's famous wide-eyes whispered threats and Pelosi's aimless ranting became standard fare to feed to the masses. Mostly, their incoherent ramblings were shucked off as just drivel, but they kept at it until it worked on the whole psyche of America. Russia was evil. Trump was a criminal. Climate change. The green new deal. Open borders. All good on the suface while America was rotting at its core.

Then along came Trump 2.0 who promised to release the Epstein files and bring the pedophiles and human traffickers to justice, to end the Ukraine conflict in 24 hours, to deport 20, no 40 million illegals, to bring down grocery prices, to stop the endless wars and declare peace, and, boldly Make America Great Again (MAGA). Now, after being duly elected and in office for almost a year, Mr. Trump, presumably the most braggadocios president ever to grace the Oval Office with his magnificent presence, has, in his mind, ended 8, 9, or 12 wars, raised "trillions" in tariffs, and made deals with every country on the planet, each one favorable to U.S. interests.

Meanwhile, right before the president's eyes, we're bombing fishing boats in the Caribbean, running what looks like a $2 trillion deficit for fiscal 2026, sending more money and arms to Ukraine, and the American dream has become unattainable to all but maybe the top 10% of earners in the United States, and even some of them are struggling to make ends meet.

Trump has redefined the limits of self-delusion. He may be outdone only by the EU's Ursula von der Leyen, but probably not. Credit is due for the president shutting down the border crossings, fighting against all the LGBTQ+ ideology, and a good number of other efforts, but, walking back from DOGE was an epic fail. Ukraine is also a loser. The economy stinks for most people, but the president keeps telling us the stock market is at all-time highs, as if that makes the people who own stocks marginally or not at all happy.

Trump's tariffs are bringing in extra revenue, setting a record for October, at $31.4 billion. But, thanks to Trump and the congress, the Big Beautiful Bill passed back in July has so far produced a $284 billion deficit and that's when the government was supposedly shut down. And, that's just the first month of the fiscal year. Can't wait to see how this all goes once Trump has his own guy or gal in at the Fed and pushes him or her to cut the federal funds rate to two percent, or one, or lower. $7 bananas and $85,000 cars aren't exactly what one might classify as "great."

Tariff revenue barely makes a dent in the $7 trillion the government plans to spend. It might come close to paying some of the interest on the ever-expanding debt, but at what cost? A middle class that can't afford a mortgage, a new car or dinner at a restaurant? Foreign nations aren't buying U.S. debt anymore, or, at least not as much as they used to. Seriously, the U.S. government issues far too much debt and then they overspend anyway, so what's the point? Maybe Trump can boast about how much money the U.S. tariffs are brining in, but how does that help regular folks? More SNAP, Section 8 housing, and $2,000 stimulus checks? No thank you.

Just about everybody in Washington is either delusional, crooked, or both.

Trump's Wall Street buddies are happy.

I suppose stockholders are happy.

But, those people at the supermarkets, they don't look very happy.

So, we're still awaiting Trump's promised "golden age" while many of the MAGA supporters have left the club, this writer included. It appears that in Trump's America, Wall Street does fine, billionaires buy more yatchs and condos, but for the regular Joes and Janes, meh. Just, meh. We just don't get it.

I may have strayed a bit from what I originally intended to say, but my bottom line is this: when you get upset that the crooks in the COMEX sent the price of silver down another buck-and-a-half overnight (when you know it should be going up), or when you gasp at two strip steaks for $34, or experience some other lunacy that is the product of the age of delusion, it's OK to blurt out, "God, I really hate these people!”

Really, it is. God may or may not be listening, but somebody within earshot might be, and you might hear, "Yeah, me too."

Happy Birthday to ME.

-- Fearless Rick

At The Close, Wednesday, December 3, 2025:
Dow: 47,882.90, +408.44 (+0.86%)
NASDAQ: 23,454.09, +40.42 (+0.17%)
S&P 500: 6,849.72, +20.35 (+0.30%)
NYSE Composite: 21,805.41, +154.92 (+0.72%)



Wednesday, December 3, 2025

U.S. - Russia Peace Talks Stalled; ADP Reports November Payrolls -45,000; Bitcoin Remains in Bear Market; Are Trump Accounts Any Good?

With the holiday season in full swing, Wall Street made up for lost ground on Tuesday, sending all the indices higher on promises for no peace and ill will toward other countries, which kind of goes against the biblical rendering, "peace on earth, good will toward men."

Most of the world is at Defcon 1 or 2 by now, getting ready for World War III, which Europe, the UK, and the United States appear to be intent on starting.

Meanwhile, Steve Witcoff and President Trump's son in-law, Jared Kushner, have traveled to Moscow, negotiating terms of their 18-28 point peace plan with Russian president Putin. Word has it that negotiations went deep into the evening, past midnight, and that the talks were "constructive", which is a media dog whistle for "we got nothing." This is the same messaging that was issued over the weekend from the meetings in Miami with officials from Ukraine. The whole "peace deal" is just plain bunk, made for media spin. The war in Ukraine will end when Russia completely wipes out the Ukraine's armed forces, which is happening on a continuous basis. Figure by June or sooner, Russia will own all of Ukraine east of the Dnieper River.

In the meantime, NATO and friends have been targeting oil tankers which are supposedly carrying Russian oil, a big no-no from an American perspective but also not something of which Mr. Putin is very fond. Russian pipelines and energy facilities have been under heavy assault the past few months. This is apparently how the West negotiates. With explosions and targeting Russia's energy infrastructure. That should work out just fine for the comedy team of Witkoff and Kushner.

Also, sooner or later, the U.S. is going to invade Venezuela, for their oil, not because they traffic drugs, as we've been told. These people are insane.

So, stocks should go up because, um, America, yeah!

Elsewhere, whether you believe last Friday's CME outage was real or a devious ploy to hide severe stress in the silver market, the usual suspects were back at work, sending the price of silver on the globex down from $59 to $57.53 in a matter of an hour right around midnight ET. Silver is gaining as the sun rises over Wall Street, trading just above $58.

Around the same time, gold received similar treatment. At around 7:30 am ET, gold was trading just above $4,200 per ounce.

The continuing suppression effort by the LBMA, CME, COMEX underlings, Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF), and/or anybody else, has become something of a running joke to serious investors. Everybody knows what they're doing, and everybody also knows that the jig is just about up. The rising price of gold and silver at various rates of change in different countries is not that gold and silver are becoming more valuable, it's that the currencies used to purchase them are losing value. Yen, yuan, euros, dollars, pounds are basically becoming toilet paper.

Gold and silver endure. Get some soon, because today's prices - even at or near all-time highs - are going to look ridiculously cheap in the not-so-distant future as the entire facade of Western prosperity and productivity meets the reality of the emerging BRICS nations. Western economies are deeply in debt and unable to escape the clutches of inflation and boom-bust cycles. The stock market cannot go up indefinitely, though it appears that the money behind the gains of the last five years, at least, aren't yet satisfied.

There's money to be made in stocks. That's for certain. How much is a matter of investing acumen, timing, and capital willing to be employed. With the Fed all but certain to cut the federal funds target rate by 0.25% next Wednesday, stocks should see solid gains between now and then and probably beyond. There just isn't any kind of anchor in the system. Nothing seems to shake the confidence level of the confidence men or the back room antics of the string-pullers.

Nobody with a functioning brain dares short this market, so the upward slope is practically guaranteed. What might it take for the markets to correct? Who knows? Wall Street manages to spin every bit of news - good or bad - into a positive for stock ownership.

So, why worry?

Maybe because the narrative doesn't quite match reality. AI hasn't produced any significant scientific breakthroughs, any significant increase in knowledge or productivity, or any other tangible result beyond writing pretty good high school and college term papers and enhanced porn. Big tech companies are investing hundreds of billions of dollars on a technology that is unlikely to ever produce positive ROI.

Then, there's bitcoin and the crypto con. Since November 22, bitcoin has gained from a low of $84,000 to over $93,000 this morning. That's all well and good and the crypto bros are once again touting "new highs, soon, real soon," and other rubbish. Bitcoin and most of the other popular copies are still 25-30% down from recent all-time highs. For all intents and purposes, crypto remains in a bear market.

What's even more concerning about bitcoin and crypto in general is that it serves no useful purpose other than providing a means to soak up excess liquidity and fund illegal activities. It's not a store of value or a viable means of exchange. Bitcoin and all the other "coins" are just speculations. Eventually, like fiat currencies, they will be worth little if anything.

Not that it matters much, but, this morning, the November ADP employment report registered a loss of 32,000 jobs in the month, missing expectations of +40,000 by a mile and well below the +47,000 upwardly-revised from October.

According to Dr. Nela Richardson, Chief Economist, ADP:

Hiring has been choppy of late as employers weather cautious consumers and an uncertain macroeconomic environment. And while November's slowdown was broad-based, it was led by a pullback among small businesses.

Thank you, Captain Obvious.

Normally, the ADP report presages the BLS Non-farm Payroll report issued the first Friday of each month, but, according to the ever-efficient federal government bureaucrats, the November report has been delayed until December 16 and will include partial data from October. Well, isn't that special? After the FOMC meeting (December 9-10).

Moving on, Money Daily did a little investigating on Trump Accounts after Michael Dell and his wife pledged to put $250 into 25 million Trump Accounts, for a total contribution of $6.25 billion. Americans have about 3.6 million births a year, so over four years time, that amounts to 14.4 million. In order for the Dells to reach the $6.25 billion target, the US birth rate would have to pretty much double, and nearly every parent of a child born during the eligibility period would have to open a Trump Account.

As usual, the hype overshadows the reality.

Q: Should you open a Trump Account if you have a baby born on or after Jan. 1, 2025, through Dec. 31, 2028?

A: Not until you read the 44-page notice the IRS has prepared. Nobody can open a Trump account until sometime next year. Contributions to Trump Accounts cannot be made before July 4, 2026. The IRS is still in the process of creating Form 4547, which has to be filed when opening a Trump Account.

The federal government will supposedly make a contribution to eligible Trump Accounts in the amount of $1000. It's free money, but the beneficiary of the account - your kid - can't touch it until they're 18. The money has to go into a bank or other non-bank custodian trustee acount and be invested in either mutual funds or ETFs. The contribution limits are $5,000 a year. After the beneficiary turns 18, any distributions are taxed as ordinary income.

Here's a thought: How about, instead of dealing with the government, banks, taxes, and the stock market, you buy $1000 worth of gold, silver, baseball cards, and comic books, store them in a safe place (like an actual "safe") and don't tell anybody? Then, you can add to it whenever you please, spend it whenever you like, do whatever you want with it. If that sounds easier and more desirable, it's because it is.

Some people may have a problem with this latest vote-buying-stock-market-pumping scheme. The $1,000 that will be donated by the government to each account is taxpayer money, or, rather, about 60% taxpayer money and about 40% borrowed from the Federal Reserve. Did anybody ask American taxpayers if they wanted their money spent this way? No.

Beyond that, the money, including any contributions made by parents, grandparents, or anybody else, goes into the system, is tracked, then eventually taxed. As usual, the government has plenty of hooks into the whole thing and is tied to Wall Street investment banks who will be getting a nice boost from these accounts which can't be touched for 18 years. Talk about building a floor under the stock market!

Here's a prediction. No more than 5 million Trump Accounts will be created, and the money invested in them will vanish, just like in the famous South Park episode.

Stock futures are pointing to a positive open. Go get 'em.

At the Close, Tuesday, December 2, 2025:
Dow: 47,474.46, +185.13 (+0.39%)
NASDAQ: 23,413.67, +137.75 (+0.59%)
S&P 500: 6,829.37, +16.74 (+0.25%)
NYSE Composite: 21,650.48, -15.98 (-0.07%)



Tuesday, December 2, 2025

Stocks Look to Rebound After Poor Start to December; Silver Continues Gains on Pathway to Triple Digits

As stocks entered the home stretch, they began to fade with the finish line in sight... story to be continued.

There are just 20 trading days left in 2025, and all indications suggest that it will go down as a solid, though unspectacular, year for equities. The Dow is up 11%; S&P up 16% and the NASDAQ ahead by 20% as of Monday's close. Those are pretty good returns, if they hold, which is why many fund managers have already closed their books and will resume buying or switching out in January. Life is good spending December in the Bahamas or Caymans.

The Dow took the worst of Monday's selloff, losing nearly one percent. As usual, it could have been worse... or better. The major indices erased most of the steep, early losses by midday, but all faded into the close. This is the kind of volatility that can be expected in an uncertain environment. Thank the government for that, at least partially, by delaying the usual economic reports - NFP and GDP in particular - and blaming their own shutdown for the lack of data.

Silver, after Friday's big run, cooled off a bit on Monday, especially after Arcadia Economics' Chris Marcus posted a note about it hitting 59 (and keeping going) in the futures market. Silver lost a bit of its mojo, but that's probably to be expected from an asset that's up 99% year-to-date. Silver won't stop rising, though there may be a few pullbacks, stutters, and surprises on its way to triple digits, where it belongs. Considering that the price of an ounce of silver would be $128 if the gold:silver ratio were a realistic 25:1 and even higher by historical standards of anywhere from 8:1 to 16:1.

Silver will be triple digits within 24 months, possibly within six.

Meanwhile, be on the lookout for the Santa Claus Rally, which usually occurs in the week between Christmas and New Year. Considering current valuations and the levels of naked greed and avarice on Wall Street, it may kick off sooner. Then again, December remains a great time to lock in gains and impress your friends.

Keep your stop losses close.

At the Close, Monday, December 1, 2025:
Dow: 47,289.33, -427.09 (-0.90%)
NASDAQ: 23,275.92, -89.76 (-0.38%)
S&P 500: 6,812.63, -36.46 (-0.53%)
NYSE Composite: 21,666.47, -158.21 (-0.72%)



Monday, December 1, 2025

WEEKEND WRAP: CME Shutdown Analysis with Commentary from Vince Lanci, Mike Maloney, David Morgan, Mario Innecco, Others, and the Silver Splurge

Without a doubt, though the mainstream media won't readily admit it, the biggest story of the week was the shutdown of the CME and COMEX late on Thanksgiving night (Thursday) and into Friday morning.

With that in mind, the usual sections in this week's WEEKEND WRAP will be shortened versions, focusing on the big story in gold and silver. Detail can be found in the Precious Metals section below.

Stocks

Stocks had one of the best weeks of the year, as the major averages advanced every day of the holiday-shortened week. Adding in the Friday prior, the majors have finished on the upside five consecutive sessions.

Treasury Yield Curve Rates

Date 1 Mo 1.5 mo 2 Mo 3 Mo 4 Mo 6 Mo 1 Yr
10/24/2025 4.11 4.06 4.02 3.93 3.89 3.76 3.58
10/31/2025 4.06 4.02 4.04 3.89 3.87 3.79 3.70
11/07/2025 4.01 3.96 3.98 3.92 3.83 3.76 3.63
11/14/2025 4.04 4.02 4.01 3.95 3.88 3.80 3.70
11/21/2025 4.03 4.01 4.00 3.90 3.84 3.75 3.62
11/28/2025 4.05 3.97 3.99 3.88 3.86 3.74 3.61

Date 2 Yr 3 Yr 5 Yr 7 Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr 30 Yr
10/24/2025 3.48 3.49 3.61 3.79 4.02 4.56 4.59
10/31/2025 3.60 3.60 3.71 3.89 4.11 4.65 4.67
11/07/2025 3.55 3.57 3.67 3.87 4.11 4.68 4.70
11/14/2025 3.62 3.61 3.74 3.92 4.14 4.73 4.74
11/21/2025 3.51 3.50 3.62 3.82 4.06 4.67 4.71
11/28/2025 3.47 3.49 3.59 3.78 4.02 4.62 4.67

Spreads remain wide. Fed speakers are in "quiet mode" prior to the next FOMC meeting, so there will be no Fed speakers in the week ahead. Otherwise, the treasury market is functioning, though there is crowding out due to excessive issuance by the U.S. Treasury, with more than $1 trillion in refunding ongoing.

Spreads:

2s-10s
2025
1/3: +32
1/10: +37
1/17: +34
1/24: +36
1/31: +36
2/7: +20
2/14: +21
2/21: +23
2/28: +25
3/7: +33
3/14: +29
3/21: +31
3/28: +38
4/4: +33
4/11: +52
4/17: +53
4/25: +55
5/2: +50
5/9: +49
5/16: +45
5/23: +51
5/30: +52
6/6: +48
6/13: +45
6/20: +48
6/27: +56
7/3: +47
7/11: +53
7/18: +56
7/25: +49
8/1: +54
8/8: +51
8/15: +58
8/22: +58
8/29: +64
9/5: +59
9/12: +50
9/19: +57
9/26: +57
10/3: +45
10/10: +53
10/17: +56
10/24: +54
10/31: +51
11/7: +56
11/14: +52
11/21: +55
11/28: +55

Full Spectrum (30-days - 30-years)
2025
1/3: +38
1/10: +54
1/17: +41
1/24: +40
1/31: +36
2/7: +32
2/14: +32
2/21: +31
2/28: +13
3/7: +24
3/14: +25
3/21: +23
3/28: +26
4/4: +5
4/11: +38
4/17: +44
4/25: +40
5/2: +41
5/9: +46
5/16: +52
5/23: +68
5/30: +59
6/6: +69
6/13: +67
6/20: +69
6/27: +66
7/3: +51
7/11: +59
7/18: +65
7/25: +55
8/1: +32
8/8: +37
8/15: +44
8/22: +41
8/29: +51
9/5: +49
9/12: +40
9/19: +54
9/26: +55
10/3: +47
10/10: +43
10/17: +42
10/24: +48
10/31: +61
11/7: +69
11/14: +70
11/21: +68
11/28: +62

Oil/Gas

WTI crude closed out the week at $58.48, which was very close to the high of the week on Friday, though numbers were skewed everywhere due to the "cooling" issue with the CME's computer banks. WTI hit a low of $57.23 on the Tuesday, November 25th, and continues to manifest weakness due to dwindling demand and a glut on world markets, the laughable sanctions against Russia's largest crude producers, Lukoil and Rosneft, not withstanding.

The U.S. national average for gas at the pump fell to $2.98, the lowest price in nearly five years, according to Gasbuddy.com. Gas prices should continue to decline over the near term and through winter.

California remains the highest in the lower 48 states, at $4.55 per gallon, down 11 cents over the past two weeks, followed by Washington ($4.15), the two constituting the $4+ club. Oregon ($3.75), was down two cents. The lowest prices remain in the Southeast, with Oklahoma checking in near the lowest price in about a year, $2.45. Louisiana ($2.50) and Mississippi ($2.51) were next. Texas ($2.52) and Arkansas ($2.54) follow. The remaining Southeast states are all below $2.80 with the exception of Florida ($3.01) down 10 cents from last week.

In the Northeast, prices remained elevated. Only New Hampshire ($2.94), Delaware ($2.98) and Maryland ($2.99) posted under $3.00, with Pennsylvania ($3.22) easily the highest. Vermont ($3.11) and New York ($3.12) were the next.

In the midwest region, where the price relief was felt the most, Illinois ($3.13) was the only state above $3.00. At the low end were Colorado ($2.49) and Kentucky ($2.61).

Sub-$3.00 gas was reported in 31 states, a gain of three from last week and five over the past two weeks.

Bitcoin

This week: $91,709.19
Last week: $87,373.34
2 weeks ago: $95,387.89
6 months ago: $104,494.50
One year ago: $96,490.37
Five years ago: $19,156.46

Bitcoin has recovered from a low of around $81,000 on November 22. It remains 26% below its all-time high of October 7 ($124.310.60).

Precious Metals

Gold:Silver Ratio: 74.80; last week: 81.33

Futures, per COMEX continuous contracts:

Gold price 10/31: $4,013.40
Gold price 11/7: $4,007.80
Gold price 11/14: $4,084.40
Gold price 11/21: $4,099.20
Gold price 11/28: $4,256.40

Silver price 10/31: $48.25
Silver price 11/7: $48.22
Silver price 11/14: $50.40
Silver price 11/21: $50.33
Silver price 11/28: $57.08

SPOT:
(stockcharts.com)
Gold 10/31: $3997.10
Gold 11/7: $3999.89
Gold 11/14: $4,080.00
Gold 11/21: $4,063.98
Gold 11/28: $4216.71

Silver 10/31: $48.65
Silver 11/7: $48.33
Silver 11/14: $50.50
Silver 11/21: $49.97
Silver 11/28: $56.37

What happened late-night on Thanksgiving (Thursday, November 27) was nothing less than pure panic in international markets. While the official story of the nearly 12-hour "dark" period of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), which includes COMEX trading, halted all futures and options trading due to a cooling failure at the CyrusOne CHI1 data center in Chicago. The technical issue forced the CME to shut down its Globex electronic trading platform, crucial for price discovery in commodities such as wheat, corn, oil, gold, silver, and U.S. equity futures.

The outage affected trading in global markets, leading to volatility and disruptions in pricing. Traders faced challenges as they reverted to traditional methods of contacting brokers due to the lack of live trading. Following the shutdown, there was a notable surge in silver prices, which increased by more than $3.00.

CyrusOne's engineering teams were actively working to restore full cooling capacity at the affected data center throughout the night and early morning. CME officials indicated that they were working to stabilize the data center and provided updates on the resumption of trading. Finally, at 8:00 am ET, CME announced that trading on its platform would resume at 8:30 am ET, in time for stock futures to price before the cash market open.

That was the official story from market operators, which almost nobody believes. The reason for the CME "pulling the plug" on its entire network run the gamut from wild conspiracy theories to more mundane explanations, such as the sheer volume of paper contracts - which are usually magnitudes higher than actual commodities available for delivery, especially gold and silver - overwhelmed the system.

Among the more assiduous claims was Vince Lanci's of Arcadia Economics on youtube.com. Lanci spoke from personal experience, outlining three scenarios:

1) The failure was technical. CMEs software or hardware malfunctioned. Lanci points out that the last two CME outages - in 2014 and 2019 - were at a time when they had no competition, but notes that the global condition has changed and the Shanghai Futures Exchange and the Shanghai Gold Exchange now compete with the CME "to define the price the world references." The outage exposes CME vulnerability.

2) Lanci observed the speculation of some traders and analysts, that at the time of the outage, silver was at an all-time high, platinum was surging and China had, on that day, launched its platinum contract. The concerns of traders put on display the erosion of confidence in Western systems as opposed to the emergence of China's platforms.

3) Lanci then looked at actual silver and gold trading during the outage, which included spiking prices at highs just as the platform shut down, then, in the "darkness" a drop in both prices, due to a lack of corresponding prices, or, counterparty affirmation. The fragmentation in these markets points up the need for comparison pricing platforms to be in continuous operation, lest price discovery becomes a one-sided affair, which does not work for global pricing.

Lanci also pointed out that the Thanksgiving event should not have happened, relating that CME has built data centers with multiple levels of redundancy and fail-safes.

Elijah K. Johnson at Miles Franklin's Liberty and Finance interviewed analyst Mario Innecco, who pointed out various efforts in Dubai, India, South Korea and elsewhere to bring silver into the global monetary universe. Central banks have begun buying silver alongside gold. Innecco cites examples from November 1979 to January 1980 when silver tripled, and 2004-05 when silver experienced $5 gains in single sessions.

Innecco called the shutdown "suspicious," and thought that CME not having backups was "far-fetched", especially on a relatively quiet post-holiday trading session. He believes premiums will go higher on Monday and thereafter, advising small investors to focus on pre-1965 "junk" silver and American Silver Eagles (ASE). He also believes silver will provide more liquidity than gold in day-to-day transactions. He called the recent moves in silver "historic", citing the bimetallic period in the U.S. prior to 1873 and the fact that silver was used as money as lately as the 1960s.

Perhaps the most emotionally-charged and circumspect analysis was that of Daivd Morgan in his weekly Morgan Report, titled "Silver’s Breakout, CME’s Breakdown, and the Quiet Hands Behind the Curtain", which is featured below. Morgan described the outage as improbable, citing, as did Vince Lanci, the redundancy and fragility in and of CME's systems.

Morgan cited Nobody Special Finance and Bob Coleman as sources backing the rumor that none other than Paul Tudor Jones made multiple market moves in silver just prior to the CME shutdown and may have been instrumental in the events of Thanksgiving evening and Friday morning.

Morgan said the story is that "paper price discovery broke" and that silver is entering what he has long-called the "recognition phase, when the world finally realizes that the metal is industrial, indispensable, and monetarily irreplaceable." Nearing the end of his report, Morgan pointed out, "above all, understand, this is not a spike but a signal. You're watching the early stages of a historic transition, the slow, grinding collapse of paper promises and the rise of real assets that cannot be printed, erased or defaulted upon. Silver just sent its warning shot. Now the real game begins."

Mike Maloney of goldsilver.com does not believe that the shutdown was necessarily tied to silver in particular, but he doesn't rule it out, saying such speculation is reasonable considering the market conditions. In his video presentation, Maloney offers examples of posts on the social platform X, which point up what othe analysts have expressed, that regardless of the cause, the system broke.

William Middlekoop, who notably has signaled a global monetary reset is imminent, posted: "'A cooling issue' Translation: We need to cool off the silver market, reposition, to avoid silver exploding higher. Markets will re-open (gold and silver) when we know we can hammer prices lower..."

The X personality known as "Ben Rickert" (played by Brad Pitt in the film, "The Big Short") (@Ben_Rickert) was highlighted in Maloney's piece. Rickert's post included the ominous message: "Money is unraveling. Confidence is eroding. Price signals are returning. And silver - the underestimated monetary metal - is leading the revolt. The bull run didn't pause. The exchange did. And that tells you everything you need to know about where this cycle is going."

Due to temporal limitations - it's now 2:30 on Sunday afternoon - it would be impossible to cite all the experts, so Money Daily will hopefully be featuring opinions from the likes of Luke Gromen, Ronald Stoeferle, Andy Schectman, Andrew Maguire, Craig Hemke, and others as events unfold beginning Monday December 1.

Money Daily's take on the issue remains the same as when first reported Friday morning. The CME shutdown is part of a larger pattern that's been developing over decades. Ordinary Americans are relentlessly cheated, conned, swindled, hustled, and lied-to by the government and its vassals in the mainstream media because, in their simple minds, "they" know what's good for "us." Lately, the con game has gone deeper, with technology strings attached, from the LGBTQ gaslighting and Covid mandates from the Biden administration to Trump's campaign promises of the tariff golden age, ending the Ukraine conflict in 24 hours, and releasing the Epstein files to the U.S. being the "hottest" country in the world, according to Trump.

Now, it's been ramped up to shutting down the government for 42 days, "losing" all the data for the October Non-farm payrolls and CPI, and delaying the release of 3rd quarter GDP figures until just before Christmas, so, it shouldn't surprise anybody when the CME goes dark, a story, by the way, that didn't even receive a headline on the Sunday talk shows. Not important, apparently.

The CME shutdown, whatever the cause, did show just how broken and untrustworthy the system has become. It's somewhat of a miracle that mail keeps being delivered. The government is bankrupt, $38 trillion in debt, China and Russia are running circles around Europe and America militarily, politically, economically, and socially. Anybody giving the government anything more than a casual shrug in anything they do or say is simply not reading the tea leaves correctly. The US government is nothing more than a massive skimming operation and the American citizens are the marks.

In specific terms as pertains to silver, the pricing on the evening of November 27 suggests that it was about to do with nickel did back in March, 2022. The March 2022 nickel spike was one of the most dramatic market events in modern commodity trading. Prices briefly soared above $100,000 per ton, forcing the London Metal Exchange (LME) to suspend trading and cancel billions of dollars’ worth of contracts. Between March 4–8, 2022, nickel prices on the LME nearly quadrupled in three trading days, rising from around $25,000/ton to over $100,000/ton, the proximate cause a short squeeze.

This could tie into the massive positions in options rumored to be the work of Paul Tudor Jones. Silver, which has been massively suppressed by the COMEX, LBMA, CME, and others, could have been spooked by huge contracts and options being placed, putting all the shorts and bullion banks at severe risk. It would explain the panic in terms of shutting down the market if silver was about to go parabolic. Consider that if silver merely tripled in price to $150 an ounce, the gold:silver ratio would still be 28, roughly double the historic level.

Back when gold first broke out in 1979-1980, above $800, silver pushed near $50 before the exchanges put the kibosh on both, by changing the rules, limiting silver trades to "sell only", which trapped the Hunt Brothers in their leveraged positions and made them the scapegoat for the collapse in gold and silver prices. Back then, between November, 1979 and February, 1980, the gold:silver ratio was in the teens, as in 15-19, closer to historic levels. If something like that, triggered by aggressive traders - not necessarily Paul Tudor Jones, but, traders in Singapore, Dubai, Shanghai, Moscow perhaps, was about to unfold, the CME, Globex, and COMEX would be sure to hit the panic button.

China and Russia have been well ahead of this trend. They've been stockpiling silver for years. Russia made it official policy in 2023.

The analysts are correct when they say the system broke down. When the truth is revealed - and it always is, eventually - it is likely that silver was about to spike to $100 an ounce all at once, wiping out the short, the specs, and maybe a couple of bullion banks with one swat. We will keep watching... and stacking.

Here are the most recent prices for common one ounce gold and silver items sold on eBay (free shipping included, numismatics excluded):

Item/Price Low High Average Median
1 oz silver coin: 56.00 71.00 61.75 61.28
1 oz silver bar: 59.00 76.00 64.61 64.10
1 oz gold coin: 4,357.90 4,656.48 4,462.34 4,447.83
1 oz gold bar: 4,245.00 4,511.05 4,425.12 4,429.47

The Single Ounce Silver Market Price Benchmark (SOSMPB) showed an incredible gain for the week, to $62.94, up $4.89 cents from the November 23 price of $58.05 per troy ounce. The small-denomination, physical market continues to add high premia over spot and derivative market pricing.

WEEKEND WRAP

The markets are quiet, for now. Silver on Kitko is quoted at 56.33, +3.09 (+5.80%). That's a pretty big move. Monday will either be a day of reckoning for the CME and COMEX (which would be a liberating day for silver stackers), or more of what everybody's become used to over the past 40 years, more suppression in price. But, ebay prices tell a different story, as do dealers, who have one-ounce coins and bars priced from $58-$65 depending on quantity and payment method.

The silver breakout is real. The story behind the CME "blackout" is probably not.

At the Close, Friday, November 28, 2025:
Dow: 47,716.42, +289.30 (+0.61%)
NASDAQ: 23,365.69, +151.00 (+0.65%)
S&P 500: 6,849.09, +36.48 (+0.54%)
NYSE Composite: 21,824.67, +111.54 (+0.51%)

For the Week:
Dow: +1471.01 (+3.18%)
NASDAQ: +1092.61 (+4.91%)
S&P 500: +246.10 (+3.73%)
NYSE Composite: +647.69 (+3.06%)
Dow Transports: +571.91 (+3.57%)



Disclaimer: Information disseminated on this site should not be construed as investment advice. Downtown Magazine Inc., Money Daily and it's owners, affiliates and/or employees are not investment advisors and do not offer specific investment advice. All investments have risk. You should consult a professional investment advisor or stock broker or use your individual judgement when making investment decisions. By viewing this site, you hold harmless Downtown Magazine Inc., Money Daily, its owners, affiliates and employees against any and all liability. Copyright 2025, Downtown Magazine Inc., all rights reserved.