Sunday, December 14, 2025

Gold, Silver, Honest Money Continue Higher as Dow, S&P 500 Make New All-Time Highs; Vince Lanci is a Tool

Editor's Note: Today, I am writing in first person singular, because I believe that when I criticize somebody, I should do it personally. -- Fearless Rick

If you're one of the many people out there who own gold and/or silver, congratulations. You've also probably heard of a fellow by the name of Vince Lanci. He runs a Substack called GoldFix and also does videos hosted by Arcadia Economics, which is Chris Marcus' baby. I have a great deal of respect for Chris Marcus, but wonder about his judgement in putting Lanci on board, because, simply put, Vince Lanci is a tool.

Some of what Lanci writes or opines about in videos makes plenty of sense, which is where one should stop. As Mark Twain so eloquently opined, "It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt." Lanci, who apparently thinks he has to impress his readers or viewers with how smart, and deep, and possessive of intimate knowledge of the inner workings of economics, usually keeps on going, making a complete ass of himself along the way.

I tempt the ghost of Mark Twain by continuing on here, because another Mark Twain pearl of wisdom states, "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience." Point taken, but I'll shoulder the risk.

What really got me going on Vinci Lanci was his post on ZeroHedge this morning, ""Why You Don't Sell Your Physical Gold & Silver." I thought he might point out that you don't sell your precious metals because they're HONEST MONEY in the truest sense of that word, without counterparty risk, or that you can use gold and silver coins and bullion as collateral, but no, Vince, always the sage, wants everybody to hold their gold and silver because it strengthens nations, and the nation in which you live counts your personal wealth as part of theirs.

Complete bunk.

Vince says, "In quiet conversations between nations, they don’t just look at official reserves. They look at total national wealth, which includes what citizens hold," and, "If the government ever faces a real emergency, private balance sheets become part of the national picture instantly."

I wanted to stop reading right there, but my inner journalist has some kind of perverse desire to see people make complete fools of themselves, and Vince was headed in the right direction.

Vince, who usually pens his garf using the regal "we" when it comes to identifying the author, and also spends time with loudmouth nonsense-spouting babblers like Tom Luongo, began inserting random quotes without attribution, as if they were godly proclamations that were undeniable truths. Like,

“The result is a two-layer reserve structure in which central bank holdings and household metal form a single strategic perimeter.”

or,

“States are responding by building deeper metallic buffers inside their borders.”

and,

“Although ownership remains private, the metal becomes visible, recognizable, and potentially mobilizable.”

...whatever that means.

Now, see here, when I use anonymous quotes in the "Toast of the Town" on the Daily Idler and in the usual summaries every month, I do so because the quotes are vitriolic, or funny, or thought-provoking and the original speaker is somebody on an internet chat room, on X, or it was spoken by some passer-by on the street. This is a tradition I started back in 1982, with my first publication of Downtown, the Unbound Magazine. If the speaker, or “quotee” desires attribution, I am only so happy to provide it. In 43 years of doing this, nobody has ever asked. If it's an historical quote by somebody famous, infamous, or otherwise noteworthy, I give proper attribution.

What Lanci has done is essentially hyperventilation of his own theses, which are deeply flawed, and, to be honest, downright stupid.

A couple of commenters agree:

Premium subscriber and obviously a genius, FKALLIBS got eight likes for this critique: "This is probably the dumbest article I've ever read on ZH."

SmallerGovNow2 said, "While I hold and believe in gold/silver, this post is a whole lot of horse shit..." (13 likes)

Lanci has to sound smart because he's on substack, and some people actually pay for his deepest, innermost thoughts on gold and silver. Most of us in the gold and silver accumulation business don't need a daily reminder of why gold and silver this or that. We know it has value and we know that fiat currencies are failing. Trying to sound all in the know about macroeconomic trends and international finnance, like Lanci does all too often (like twie a day) adds nothing to the conversation.

The other reason I think Vince is a tool is because I once offered (try reaching him; it's nearly impossible) to trade advertising on my sites in exchange for his premium substack subscription. After waiting three weeks for a reply, I messaged again, complaining that he could at least acknowledge the message and that his work was crackpot rehashing of other people's ideas. Lo and behold, Lanci then responded with a firm, impolite, "f--- you," informing me that I had no idea how busy he was. Well, darn. it takes less than a minute to respond to a DM, which he proved by responding to my insult. Tool. Utter, cast iron, dead weight TOOL. I'm glad we never made a deal with Lanci. I don't fancy associations with arrogant, self-absorbed bumpkins. WOuld make me look bad. Besides, I would hardly read his stuff, so much of it being reconstituted, partially-plagiarized vomit.

OK, now I know that I write quite a bit, so I probably shouldn’t be criticizing a fellow voice on alternate media, but, when you're wrong, you're wrong, and Lanci is the type who will never admit it. Yes, I make mistakes. Most recently, I stumbled on some math, mistaking $1.972 billion for $1.972 trillion. Sorry, lack of sleep, maybe. I'm usually dead-on, math-wise.

So, if Vince reads this, he'll likely consider me to be beneath him somehow and my criticisms may engender a nasty comment or email. Always good to hear from my betters, I guess. Who cares? I stand uncorrected.

•. •. •. •.

Entering the final session of the week, stocks have risen to new all-time highs on the Dow and S&P. The NASDAQ lags, weighed down by AI skepticism, about 265 points short of its all-time high. On the week, through Thursday's close, the Dow is at a new high, up 749 points; the NASDAQ has gained a mere 15 points, and the S&P, also closing at a record high Thursday, is up 30 points.

With the opening ball 30 minutes ahead, stock futures are split, with the Dow up 92, the NASDAQ down 133 and the S&P off 6 points.

Gold and silver are raging higher. Spot silver reached $64.62 overnight and is holding at $64.16. Gold is rocking, at $$4,339.60, heading towards its all-time high of $4,355.18. Bitcoin ($92,325.51) can't shake the losses.

I'm waiting for somebody like Mike Maloney or maybe even Chris Marcus to do a spoof ad, "Got Metal?" Maybe I'll meme it.

See you on Sunday for the WEEKEND WRAP.

At the Close, Thursday, December 11, 2025:
DOW: 48,704.01, +646.26 (+1.34%)
NASDAQ: 23,593.86, -60.30 (-0.25%)
S&P 500: 6,901.00, +14.32 (+0.21%)
NYSE Composite: 22,114.42, +181.11 (+0.83%)



Thursday, December 11, 2025

Crossing Out Pandemic Era Prices; Fed Cuts FF Rate, Re-Starts QE, Buying Bills; Oracle Reports, Stock Tanks

In horse racing handicapping, the most astute observers of form, pace, and condition will often take an unusually poor performance by an otherwise dependable steed and "put a line through it," withdrawing a bad race from the overall past performance presentation.

That approach would probably fit well within the scope of long-term investors as it pertains to the pandemic or "covid" era from February, 2020 and - depending on the particular asset - anywhere from June, 2020 to March, 2021. Taking a "before and after" snapshot of the period in between given dates, eliminates the aberrant period in which asset values were whipsawed lower and then back higher, producing a continuity in pricing that is at once more realistic and more reliable for assessing true valuations.

While it may be futile to point this out to the horde of momentum-chasing droids that populate the current investor class since few bother to look back five years, much less five weeks, when performing due diligence, if they bother with that at all. Nonetheless, smoothing out bumps and grinds along the pathways of stocks, bonds, commodities and their varied derivatives is part of the rigor of value investing. It's why moving averages are important.

For those not desirous of a deep look at the past, it's useful to note that most five year charts now, at long last, do not cover the pandemic era at all. By December, 2020, most of the financial horrors had already been relegated to a fresh dustbin of history, though effects on the human psyche and physical health persisted longer, some even to this day. One cannot easily draw a line through personal tragedy or long term illness and death has its own black line, drawn with a permanent marker.

The passage of time and the wisdom of charts has done some of the work for investors by taking out some of the bad experience, but, five years of past performances may be suitable for a seven-year-old racehorse, it's a little short on the history of companies, especially those like Dow stocks that have been around for decades. Well, some of them, at least.

Those bearing recency bias may want to perform a similar line-out on the tariff tantrum from April through July of 2025. It was also an aberration that should not be included in 52-week high or low measurements. All assets, classes, and stocks are different, so employing sound judgement on such matters is a requirement.

Looking at more recent developments, the FOMC did what everybody expected and cut the federal funds target rate 0.25%, to 3.50-3.75%, the lowest in three years. The Fed also restarted QE, announcing that they would begin buying $40 billion worth of short-dated treasury bills immediately at Chairman Powell's press conference following the policy statement. Claiming that the purchase of short-term bills is "not QE", this latest liquidity push is not explicit in the official statements, but rather referenced in the implementation note, directing the Open Market Desk at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to:

Increase the System Open Market Account holdings of securities through purchases of Treasury bills and, if needed, other Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less to maintain an ample level of reserves.

Roll over at auction all principal payments from the Federal Reserve's holdings of Treasury securities. Reinvest all principal payments from the Federal Reserve's holdings of agency securities into Treasury bills.

Thus, there are no reins on the NY Fed. They are free to purchase T-bills and roll over expiring bills, notes, and bonds into exclusively bills.

This indicates, as none other than "Big Short" Michael Burry opines that such a move shows that the banking sector is stressed, not "stable" as many pundits would like to reference its current condition. (Editor's Note: Oddly enough, after clicking the link to the story above, Money Daily was prompted to log into its msn account, with the message, "since you are accessing sensitive information..." How about that? Now, financial information concerning Michael Burry is now sensitive?)

The next FOMC meetings are scheduled for January 27-28 and March 17-18. The Fed made no reference toward cutting rates any further.

All of this just helped silver bump a lttle higher. With the U.S. stock markets open in half an hour, silver continues to make new all-time highs, Silver hit a high of $62.93 overnight and is holding above $62 currently. Gold is steady at $4,219, and looking to advance.

Stock futures are lower, with Dow futures right at breakeven, NASDAQ futures off 147 points and S&P futures down 25.

Oracle (ORCL) reported before the open. The stock is tanking in the pre-market, down more than 13%. Not to worry, the U.S. government owns 10% of the company. Yeah, how's that working out?

Trouble's brewing. Hurry, Santa! We've all been nice this year!

At the Close, Wednesday, December 10, 2025:
Dow: 48,057.75, +497.46 (+1.05%)
NASDAQ: 23,654.16, +77.67 (+0.33%)
S&P 500: 6,886.68, +46.17 (+0.67%)
NYSE Composite: 21,933.31, +278.52 (+1.29%)



Wednesday, December 10, 2025

Silver Price Riggers Swamped, Overwhelmed as the End of Debt-Based Fiat Currency Accelerates; Fed Rate Cut Expected at 2:00 pm ET

Accolades are in order for the silver price suppressors concerning Tuesday's trading. Huzzah! All praise to the riggers!

As is their usual mode of operation, in the overnight trade of December 8, leading to the morning of December 9, the usual suspects managed to smash the silver price down to $57.54. Hours later, during regular trading in New York, the price of an ounce of silver had reached the unprecedented all-time high of $60.88 in the spot market.

The price suppression cartel that operates between the United States and England has been fully broken and defeated. Within the past month alone, the price of silver has increased more than 21%. Over six months, the rise has been more than 66%, and year-to-date silver has achieved what many long-term holders of precious metals thought to be impossible: the price of silver has advanced some 109%, affirming that whatever mechanisms the New York to London fixes, spoofs, and unconscionable suppression tactics have been undertaken have failed, and failed miserably.

Implications to global economics are profound and only beginning to be understood. Silver's rising price represents a wholesale repudiation of Western economic hegemony and a radical shift from derivative pricing to physical, not just in the United States and Europe, but around the world.

A day or so ago, Fearless Rick watched a video produced by Chris Martenson, accompanied by Paul Kiker, near the end of which both presenters were dumbfounded as to why central banks were so intent on keeping the price of silver suppressed. Neither could come up with a good reason. On Tuesday, Rick posted a reply on the youtube page, republished here, which answers their question rather succinctly:

To Chris and Paul: I just wanted to offer my opinion on why central banks and major economies like the US and (ahem) England want to keep the price of silver down is because of one simple reason: It's MONEY, just like gold, and central bankers with the ability to conjure fiat currency out of thin air DO NOT APPRECIATE COMPETITION. The suppression of silver didn't happen when silver was taken out of circulation in 1965 in the US. It began much further back, in 1873, when central banks sought to remove the bi-metallic standard from with the U.S. and elsewhere and make gold the prime financial asset with the coinage act of 1973. What became known as the "Crime of '73" demonetized silver and facilitated the suffering of farmers and common people in the United States.

I have written on the subject many times on my website, https://dtmagazine.com. You can go and read my assessments of why central bankers hate silver more than gold or read many other articles around the internet. I'll certainly be writing more about banking and silver as long as I can, and actually featured silver on the money page of December's idleguy.com (https://idleguy.com/122025/8money.php).

There are far-reaching ramifications concerning silver that will come to actualization in the months and years ahead, the most powerful of which will likely be a return to sane and historic gold:silver ratio of what I believe will eventually be 10:1. By putting silver in proper perspective relative to gold and the US$, much of the world will experience prosperity as they never have before. Imagine the populations of India, China, much of the Middle East, Africa, South America and, of course, in developed nations as well, being pulled from poverty just by the men act of silver being finally recognized for its monetary potential. You can pay attention to this world-shattering event as it occurs or deny it. The choice is yours. Good day and good luck.

It's a good thing Money Daily copy/pasted the comment, because, like most of Fearless Rick's commentary, it was quickly removed (We'll repost it, again, and again, and again).

As far as the gold:silver ratio returning to the natural level of 10:1 is concerned, that development may take years, or could happen overnight, should a major economic power - India, China, Russia, Indonesia or even Saudi Arabia, or all of them - officially peg silver to gold at a 10:1 ratio. Not that it may happen, but the likelihood of it happening grows significantly closer as the ratio, even with the COMEX, CME, and the LBMA squirming to retain control continue to exist.

As of Tuesday evening, the ratio has fallen to its lowest level since 2021, 69.43, and it is likely to decline even further. Just a few weeks ago that ratio was above 84. The movement should not be easily disregarded as it represents the initial thrust in what figures to be a long-term trend. There's no doubt that the regime of fractional reserve, fiat debt-based money is nearing an end. Silver may very well be the vehicle that accelerates or completes the process.

With the stock market opening in about 30 minutes, the price of silver is holding around $60.80 after hitting a record high of $61.64 overnight in the spot market. Whatever techniques the riggers are using, they aren't working very well presently.

The big deal on Wednesday will be the conclusion of the final FOMC meeting of the year. At 2:00 pm ET the FOMC will unveil what figures to be a 25 basis point cut to the federal funds rate, from 3.75-3.50% down to 3.50-3.25%. Chairman Jerome Powell will hold the customary press conference a half hour after the announcement, and FOMC members will reveal their economic projections.

Stock futures are flat, bitcoin is hovering around the $92,000 mark and WTI crude oil is up 13 cents, at $58.38.

At the Close, Tuesday, December 9, 2025:
Dow: 47,560.29, -179.03 (-0.38%)
NASDAQ: 23,576.49, +30.58 (+0.13%)
S&P 500: 6,840.51, -6.00 (-0.09%)
NYSE Composite: 21,654.78, -48.41 (-0.22%)



Tuesday, December 9, 2025

Will the Fed's Hawkish Rate Cut Stop the Rally in Stocks?; Health Insurance Tax Credits Remain Unresolved, Another Government Shutdown Possible

There's been a lot of talk lately about a "hawkish" rate cut about to be promoted by the Federal Reserve's FOMC on Wednesday and this has left markets - stocks, bonds, and commodities - a little bit confused. While the widely-expected 25 basis point slash to the federal funds target rate is, in isolation, dovish, rhetoric from the Fed governors, regional presidents, and Chairman Powell himself may lean slightly to the rational side that believes inflation is still not fully under control nor is the base economy in dire enough straits to automatically assume the Fed's path is toward further easing.

Chairman Powell is likely to touch on these topics at his post-policy press conference and his points may be well-grounded, though, in the absence or delays of the usual government reports isn't going to clarify matters for the Fed's position one way or another. For instance, November PPI has now been delayed for release until January 14, the government shutdown being blamed for the delay by the bean-counters at the BLS.

Investopedia has published a list of reports that have already been delayed with the new release dates and some that have yet to be rescheduled. The somewhat long list itself is now five days old; some of the dates have been changed, again; and the lack of data implies that the Fed is "flying blind" no matter which way their economic bias trends. The lack of data also provides a potential escape hatch for any miscalculations the Fed might encounter. It wouldn't surprise anybody to hear strained apologies from Fed officials in February or March about higher prices, or low employment, or any number of economic pitfalls that may occur before, during, or after January 31, when the funding approved to end the shutdown three weeks ago runs out again.

There's every possibility that the government will shut down again, as the core issue of extending or rescinding health insurance tax credits remains unresolved with congressional holidays soon to commence. Both houses will be on holiday from December 20 through January 4. It's true that the people most responsible for the government shutdown, and lack of, or delayed, data releases are the 535 members of congress who seem unable to agree on anything beyond support for Ukraine and their own salaries. As a whole, the Senators and Representatives have been largely mute when it comes to resolving core issues and they're nowhere near consensus or compromise on the main stumbling block.

In the meantime, many Americans face a December 15 deadline to choose an insurance provider. Congress has once again left them in the lurch, without a clear decision. Many Americans may choose to opt out of choosing altogether. Premiums and deductibles on the available plans remain sky-high and congress has forwarded no guidance going forward. It's almost as if the shutdown, ostensibly forced by Democrats opposed to the cancellation of Obamacare subsidies (by Republicans in the One Big Beautiful Bill) was all for naught and the country will be forced back into indecision and shutdown again by February 1.

Inaction at the congressional level provides the Federal Reserve plenty of cover for whatever monetary policies they prefer to promote. "Don't blame us, it was them," is likely to be the phrase rising up the unaccountability chart with a bullet in early 2026 as the economy suffers, people are forced into buying things - health insurance - they don't want or can’t afford, and the media spin gyrates out of control.

What the FOMC will accomplish on Wednesday, in association with Jerome Powell and others' jawboning immediately afterwards, has all the elements of a bait-and-switch. The Fed will cut the target rate down to 3.50-3.75%, that's a given, but the talk will be about further rate cuts, in January and beyond, which the fed mouthpieces are certain to downplay. In other words, after this cut, no more, and maybe not for a long time, so you'll get some relief, but there's no guarantee we will do more of the same. In essence, the Fed is cutting rates rather reluctantly while implying that there will be a rough road ahead and they'll be standing back and watching instead of acting.

As the Wednesday 2:00 pm ET date with destiny approaches, markets remain unresolved and taking bites of reality into account. Stocks turned lower on Monday, and stock futures are heading lower across the board this morning. Actions of the Federal Reserve don't occur in a vacuum. There are more issues surrounding the economy of the U.S. and the rest of the world to consider. The unwinding of the Yen carry trade is becoming a hot-button issue, the AI spending spree is coming under considerable scrutiny as are most government policies. Reality rears its ugly head again and more people are paying attention, noticing that government and media characterizations of the state of affairs doesn't quite jibe with what they're experiencing on a day-to-day basis.

A Santa Rally may be in the offing come bonus time, but there's a good chance it will occur at levels well below what's current.

After what looks to be a "hawkish rate cut" might the next move on the markets be one of Orwellian design, like "stocks rally lower?"

At the Close, Monday, December 8, 2025:
Dow: 47,739.32, -215.67 (-0.45%)
NASDAQ: 23,545.90, -32.22 (-0.14%)
S&P 500: 6,846.51, -23.89 (-0.35%)
NYSE Composite: 21,703.20, -106.88 (-0.49%)



Sunday, December 7, 2025

WEEKEND WRAP: Gold:Silver Ratio at 72, Lowest in Four Years; FOMC Rate Cut Expectations Skew Yields; Stocks Playing Waiting Game; Gas Prices Lowest in Five Years

The main focus of the past week, and something that has captured the attention of not a small slice of the investing world, continued to be the silver gambit, as the shiny precious metal continued to make new all-time highs the week following the still mysterious CME global shutdown. There continue to be reverberations from that seminal event, which may, over time, be looked upon as a epochal turning point in global economics. While there are plenty of people who may casually disregard the event and take without any grains of salt the official story of a cooling systems failure, the lack of any official government investigation leads on to conclude that there is actually something to see there, but the insiders don't want you to know what it is.

Stocks languished as bonds flourished, the rate cut odds providing ample rationale to flee from risk. Despite the usual suppression operations, gold and silver exhibited more than usual volatility. Pressure to the upside in prices is obvious and ominous at the same time.

The week ahead will be mostly about the Fed and the rate cut on Wednesday. In particular, it can be safely assumed that markets were playing the waiting game the past week, anticipating the all-powerful wizard of OZ FOMC emitting a bolt of lightning to shock and awe all participants.

Stocks

Stocks wasted everybody's time, with the operripe NASDAQ leading the way with a gain of 0.91%. The other indices were up much less than that, with the NYSE Composite actually registering a loss on the week. Equity investors are desperate for a Santa Claus rally, which could come in the form of a 0.25% rate cut at the FOMC meeting this coming week, on Tuesday and Wednesday, December 9 and 10, the latter date saved for the 2:00 pm ET official rate policy announcement.

While the expected drop in the federal funds rate from 4.00-4.25% to 3.75-4.00% may be good for stocks, it's probably going to be better for gold, silver, and possibly bitcoin, though the crypto king has been in a prolonged slump since early October and may be unable to convince enough suckers of its fabulous, long-term potential as a monetary replacement for the U.S. dollar (dreaming).

The stock market remains very close to all-time highs, and one wonders how long investors will hold onto the idea of seven stocks holding up the entire market structure on the promises of an AI revolution. The narrative has grown thin as the big players - Amazon, Google, Apple, Meta, Nvidia, etc. - are throwing hundreds of billions of dollars to build out data centers and power stations without much in the way of positive return being demonstrated.

AI, while it is useful in many functions, is not in itself a revolutionary development. It is something akin to a much faster search engine, a super-quick graphic card, and a relatively erudite wordsmith. It's main attraction is its ability to parse data at lightning speeds, which requires intense amounts of computing power. Applications for business and industry are paramount, but the promulgation of smaller, well-defined small language models (SMEs) may prove eventually to be cheaper and of more efficient use than the race toward large language models (LLMs) sought by the mega-tech companies.

As with every incident of technological advancement, there exists small start-ups and mid-cap companies whose use and advancement of the technology may produce returns that dwarf those of their gigantic rivals. Identifying those companies poised to benefit from further advancement in AI (which should be eventually deflationary when brought to scale) would be a worthwhile undertaking for the keenest of stock pickers.

Since Money Daily is not in the business of giving investment advice, we'll leave it at that, offering direction instead.

As the year of 2025 draws to a conclusion, stocks appear to have locked in rather solid gains. With just 17 trading days left, the Dow is up 12.73% year-to-date, the S&P up 16.81%, and the NASDAQ up 22.10%.

The NYSE Composite is up 14.21% on the year, and the Dow Jones Transportation Average lags, at +8.10%. Without sufficient catalysts to move stocks much higher, there's a good possibility for pullback on profit taking. There remains more than ample rationale to exit with profits before the calendar turns, with tax implications of this year and fourth quarter earnings results ahead in the new year.

While the top may already be in for this leg of the rally, nobody's yet to ring a bell, so, as anyone with two eyes is aware, this bubble may not be anywhere near bursting and a ride higher through the holiday season remains the general sentiment, and deservedly so, as the stock market usually performs rather well in December.

Individuals and institutions are likely to make their own choices based upon their investment regimens, which obviously have wide variety. Up, down, or mixed, seems to be the state of play.

Treasury Yield Curve Rates

Date 1 Mo 1.5 mo 2 Mo 3 Mo 4 Mo 6 Mo 1 Yr
10/31/2025 4.06 4.02 4.04 3.89 3.87 3.79 3.70
11/07/2025 4.01 3.96 3.98 3.92 3.83 3.76 3.63
11/14/2025 4.04 4.02 4.01 3.95 3.88 3.80 3.70
11/21/2025 4.03 4.01 4.00 3.90 3.84 3.75 3.62
11/28/2025 4.05 3.97 3.99 3.88 3.86 3.74 3.61
12/05/2025 3.82 3.78 3.77 3.71 3.73 3.68 3.61

Date 2 Yr 3 Yr 5 Yr 7 Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr 30 Yr
10/31/2025 3.60 3.60 3.71 3.89 4.11 4.65 4.67
11/07/2025 3.55 3.57 3.67 3.87 4.11 4.68 4.70
11/14/2025 3.62 3.61 3.74 3.92 4.14 4.73 4.74
11/21/2025 3.51 3.50 3.62 3.82 4.06 4.67 4.71
11/28/2025 3.47 3.49 3.59 3.78 4.02 4.62 4.67
12/05/2025 3.56 3.59 3.72 3.90 4.14 4.75 4.79

Fed speakers are in "quiet mode" prior to this week's FOMC meeting (Tuesday-Wednesday) as the 25 basis point cut seems virtually assured, especially given recent employment data. In the absence of the usual Non-farm Payroll data from the BLS, November's ADP report of a 45,000 jobs loss for the month sufficed to move the needle sufficiently in the direction of easier money.

Bond vigilantes weren't exactly sold on the idea, sending longer maturities higher over the week while the short end of the curve was brought lower. Yields on one-month bills declined a solid 23 basis points with the remainder giving up less until evening out at the one-year level, rising on maturities beyond that. The 30-year yield was the highest in three months (4.86% on September 4). While no cause for immediate alarm, the rise on longer-dated maturities signals that the general market still considers inflation an issue and the general tenor of U.S. fiscal policy for too loosey-goosey, for lack of a better term.

Spreads blew out, with the full spectrum (30 days - 30 years) reaching an unprecedented extreme of +97 as the polar fixtures moved in opposite directions. 2s-10s were better behaved, reaching 58, a three-month high, indicative of the many stresses in the funding mechanisms for U.S. fiscal profligacy.

From a near-term perspective, the sudden jerking of the entire curve, lower on one end, higher on the other, may seem troubling, but overall, a steepening should prove beneficial to the government as it attempts to reign in its extravagance, at least at the margins. Not to be concerned, congress will almost certainly find ways to overspend borrowed money until, well, something breaks, ostensibly, U.S. taxpayers.

Spreads:

2s-10s
2025
1/3: +32
1/10: +37
1/17: +34
1/24: +36
1/31: +36
2/7: +20
2/14: +21
2/21: +23
2/28: +25
3/7: +33
3/14: +29
3/21: +31
3/28: +38
4/4: +33
4/11: +52
4/17: +53
4/25: +55
5/2: +50
5/9: +49
5/16: +45
5/23: +51
5/30: +52
6/6: +48
6/13: +45
6/20: +48
6/27: +56
7/3: +47
7/11: +53
7/18: +56
7/25: +49
8/1: +54
8/8: +51
8/15: +58
8/22: +58
8/29: +64
9/5: +59
9/12: +50
9/19: +57
9/26: +57
10/3: +45
10/10: +53
10/17: +56
10/24: +54
10/31: +51
11/7: +56
11/14: +52
11/21: +55
11/28: +55
12/5: +58

Full Spectrum (30-days - 30-years)
2025
1/3: +38
1/10: +54
1/17: +41
1/24: +40
1/31: +36
2/7: +32
2/14: +32
2/21: +31
2/28: +13
3/7: +24
3/14: +25
3/21: +23
3/28: +26
4/4: +5
4/11: +38
4/17: +44
4/25: +40
5/2: +41
5/9: +46
5/16: +52
5/23: +68
5/30: +59
6/6: +69
6/13: +67
6/20: +69
6/27: +66
7/3: +51
7/11: +59
7/18: +65
7/25: +55
8/1: +32
8/8: +37
8/15: +44
8/22: +41
8/29: +51
9/5: +49
9/12: +40
9/19: +54
9/26: +55
10/3: +47
10/10: +43
10/17: +42
10/24: +48
10/31: +61
11/7: +69
11/14: +70
11/21: +68
11/28: +62
12/5: +97

Oil/Gas

WTI crude closed out the week at $60.14, departing from a two-week skid into the $50s, based primarily on what speculators must have considered to be oversold conditions, given that the latest round of sanctions propose to bring the evil Russian empire of crude oil to its knees and President Trump's 28, or 24, or 18-point peace plan were a sure step in the right direction towards an end of hostilities in Ukraine. What the half-hearted proposal did was provide cover for the failures of U.S. foreign policy, another short-term victory for the war promoters of Europe and the deep state in America, and more time for Russia's military to advance along the battle lines.

Such is the kind of lunacy effective in energy markets and the idle minds on Capitol Hill and in the White House. 18 rounds of sanctions designed to damage Russia haven't worked, but the 19th surely will. At this juncture, Senator Graham's proposal for even more extreme sanctions on Russia and its trading partners appear to have broad support, since everything up to this point hasn't worked. Indeed, THIS TIME will be different. Promise!

The U.S. national average for gas at the pump fell to $2.92, the lowest price in roughly five years and six cents lower than the prior week, according to Gasbuddy.com. Gas prices should continue to decline over the near term and through winter which is nothing but good news for stretched consumers and businesses.

California remains the highest in the lower 48 states, at $4.45 per gallon, down 10 cent on the week and 21 cents over the past three weeks, followed by Washington ($4.17), the two constituting the membership of the lonely $4+ club. Oregon ($3.69), was down six cents. The lowest prices remain in the Southeast, with Oklahoma checking in near the lowest price in over a year, $2.30, another radical drop of 15 cents just this week. Colorado ($2.39) and Texas ($2.42) were next. Arkansas ($2.46) and Mississippi ($2.48) and Louisiana ($2.49) follow. The remaining Southeast states are all below $2.76 with the exception of Florida ($3.91) down 20 cents in two weeks time.

In the Northeast, prices remain elevated, though at the early stages of what appears to be a general decline. Delaware ($2.89) was the lowest in the region, joined by New Hampshire, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Maryland under $3.00, with Pennsylvania ($3.17) steady as the highest. Vermont ($3.12) and New York ($3.09) following lower.

In the midwest region, where the price relief has been significant, Illinois ($3.04) was the only state above $3.00. At the low end were Colorado ($2.39) and Iowa ($2.56).

Sub-$3.00 gas was reported in fully 34 states, a gain of three from last week and eight over the past two weeks.

Bitcoin

This week: $90,860.37
Last week: $91,709.19
2 weeks ago: $87,373.34
6 months ago: $105,525.30
One year ago: $99,819.01
Five years ago: $18,810.76

Bitcoin has recovered from a low of around $81,000 on November 22. It remains 27% or lower beneath its all-time high of October 7 ($124.310.60). A purchase of bitcoin five years ago still yields a five-bagger. It was nearly a seven-bagger two months ago. It doesn't take much in the way of fundamental analysis to conclude that bitcoin's current path is reminiscent of that of the period from mid-November, 2021 to the end of January, 2022, when it lost nearly $30,000, being cut almost in half, on its way from the high above $64,000 to a low in the $16,000 range, a roughly 75% decline.

The current trajectory puts bitcoin at $30,000 within a year's time, not the $200,000 or $1 million suggested by the likes of Anthony Scaramucci or Michael Saylor, whose business, Strategy (MSTR), will be pretty much bankrupted with such a decline. Charts are charts and cycles are cycles. Bitcoin cheerleaders haven't had much in the way of good things to say about crypto the past few months except that it's cheap, which is like saying the Colorado Rockies will probably win more games next season (maybe).

Precious Metals

Gold:Silver Ratio: 72.01; last week: 74.80

Futures, per COMEX continuous contracts:

Gold price 11/7: $4,007.80
Gold price 11/14: $4,084.40
Gold price 11/21: $4,099.20
Gold price 11/28: $4,256.40
Gold price 12/5: $4,227.70

Silver price 11/7: $48.22
Silver price 11/14: $50.40
Silver price 11/21: $50.33
Silver price 11/28: $57.08
Silver price 12/5: $58.80

SPOT:
(stockcharts.com)
Gold 11/7: $3999.89
Gold 11/14: $4,080.00
Gold 11/21: $4,063.98
Gold 11/28: $4216.71
Gold 12/5: $4,196.63

Silver 11/7: $48.33
Silver 11/14: $50.50
Silver 11/21: $49.97
Silver 11/28: $56.37
Silver 12/5: $58.28

Friday's closing futures price for gold on the COMEX is kind of a sick joke, considering that gold futures hit a high of $4,292.30 on Monday, December 1, and $4,279.50 on Friday, December 5. The gold price suppressors remain fully in control in terms of the gold market, with central banks worldwide more than willing to accede to their pricing scheme as they continue to accumulate the Tier 1 asset of choice.

What is not so funny is the loss of control of silver futures, that metric being led by physical spot pricing in the real world. With the March contract as the front end, silver futures are back in contango, though the highest price on the futures chain of $60.69 one year out (December 2026) does not reflect very much of the spot market supply side reality. Industrial demand, increasing investment interest, and a severe supply shortage continue to pressure prices higher and the gold:silver ratio lower, to a level not seen since July, 2021, as the world was emerging from the brief and painful COVID experience.

The covid slump, which sent the GSR down to a low of 65.41 in February, 2021, was neither very deep nor lasting. Gold and silver prices quickly recovered, with gold the leading edge. This was nothing compared to the post-GFC level of 31.60 posted in February 2011, as silver skyrocketed ahead of all other assets out of the slump, reaching its highest prices since 1980.

From an historical perspective, the lowest levels of the gold:silver ratio were in 1968 and 1980, when this metric was measured in the teens. In between, through the 1970s, the GSR gyrated around the low to mid-30s. This period, post-Vietnam and also post-Bretton Woods, was a time of relative peace and prosperity for much of the world. Once the mechanisms were fully in place for price suppression of precious metals, the proponents of such found it easier to control the price of silver that that of gold, the former being a much smaller market. Of course, this period was subsequent to silver being demonetized in the United States (In 1965 silver coins were removed from circulation and in 1968 silver certificates were no longer redeemable for physical metal.) and antecedent to the infamous Hunt Brothers' escapades in the silver market in 1979 and 1980.

Conditions have changed dramatically since then. In the 50+ years since the 70s, the United States became the world's greatest debtor nation, arguably the world's foremost military aggressor and global hegemon, and today is experiencing a decline in financial and political dominance as the world becomes increasingly fractured and polarized. The main industrial use of silver was in film processing in the 70s and 80s. Today, it's solar energy, EV technology, and military manufacturing, much greater use.

What is also propelling the price of silver higher and the gold:silver ratio lower is the increased interest in silver as a monetary metal. It was 60 years ago that silver was used as a common currency, a medium of exchange, as money in not just the United States, but in many countries around the world. While silver is no longer accepted as currency or legal tender in most of the world, that is changing rapidly in major economies such as China, India, and even the United States.

The Sound Money Defense League and Money Metals produce the Sound Money Index which rates the individual states on various criteria in terms of the free use of gold and silver as money. On April 1, 2026, Indian citizens will have the ability to use silver coins and jewelry as collateral for loans, and China, which maintained a silver standard until 1935, has a long history with silver as money.

While silver minted as currency ended abruptly in the mid-20th century, the minting of silver coins for investment purposes has continued uninterrupted. From Canadian Maple Leafs, U.S. Silver Eagles, Australian Kangaroos, Cinese Pandas, and Mexican Libertads, the minting of silver coins of high (.999) purity has proceeded uninterrupted.

Those who believe that a return to a 10:1, 15:1 or 20:1 gold:silver ratio simply don't know their history. It has only been in the past 150 years (essentially since the "Crime of 1873") that silver has not held a tight peg to gold. Recent developments, such as India maximizing silver loans at a 10:1 ratio to gold (1 kilogram gold to 10 kilograms silver) and the Dubai Bank of Bullion specifying minimum purchases of 1 Oz of Gold, Platinum or Palladium and 10 Oz of Silver as minimum purchases, suggest a stealth reordering of the gold:silver ratio.

While the gold:silver ratio appears to be beginning a trend lower, getting back to historical standards of 10:1 ro 20:1 would likely take decades, or, it could happen in the blink of an eye, taking just one populous country, such as India or China, to formally declare a gold:silver ratio for a global reset to occur. The arbitrage possibilities would be so enormous that most, if not all, other countries would soon fall in line with the new standard. It is something that all siver and gold investors should carefully consider.

In the meantime, silver continues its recent acceleration over gold. Year-to-date, silver is up 101.95% to gold's rise of 60.66%. In just the past six months, silver is up a whopping 60% compared to gold's rather "pedestrian" 26%, and the meteoric rise of silver may be just beginning. The gold:silver ratio can drop rapidly. As it is, it has fallen from over 100 in May to its current level of 72. That's 30 points in just eight months. If the trend continues, imagine where it might be in five years and what the price of both gold and silver might be. Estimates range from the reasonable to the absurd, but the numbers bandied about recently focus around $10,000 for gold and $700 for silver, a GSR around 14. Over the near term, $5000 gold and $100 silver (50:1) does not seem far-fetched, even as early as the coming new year.

Here are the most recent prices for common one ounce gold and silver items sold on eBay (free shipping included, numismatics excluded):

Item/Price Low High Average Median
1 oz silver coin: 59.50 69.95 66.23 67.48
1 oz silver bar: 62.00 73.95 66.62 66.43
1 oz gold coin: 4,221.99 4,518.12 4,400.19 4,389.92
1 oz gold bar: 4,338.76 4,477.78 4,400.74 4,386.88

The Single Ounce Silver Market Price Benchmark (SOSMPB) delivered, for the second straight week, an impressive gain, to $66.69, up $3.75 cents from the November 30 price of $62.94 per troy ounce. The small-denomination, physical market continues to add high premia over spot and derivative market pricing.

WEEKEND WRAP

As legend goes, the eminent J.P. Morgan, when queried on whether he thought markets will go up or down, paused a moment and said, as sagaciously as possible, "markets will fluctuate." That, friends, is a truism that should always be top of mind when making any kind of investment decision.

At the Close, Friday, December 5, 2025:
Dow: 47,954.99, +104.05 (+0.22%)
NASDAQ: 23,578.13, +72.99 (+0.31%)
S&P 500: 6,870.40, +13.28 (+0.19%)
NYSE Composite: 21,810.07, -25.72 (-0.12%)

For the Week:
Dow: +238.57 (+0.50%)
NASDAQ: +212.44 (+0.91%)
S&P 500: +21.31 (+0.31%)
NYSE Composite: -14.60 (-0.07%)
Dow Transports: +597.31 (+3.60%)



Disclaimer: Information disseminated on this site should not be construed as investment advice. Downtown Magazine Inc., Money Daily and it's owners, affiliates and/or employees are not investment advisors and do not offer specific investment advice. All investments have risk. You should consult a professional investment advisor or stock broker or use your individual judgement when making investment decisions. By viewing this site, you hold harmless Downtown Magazine Inc., Money Daily, its owners, affiliates and employees against any and all liability. Copyright 2025, Downtown Magazine Inc., all rights reserved.