Former NY Fed Goldmanite Dudley Attacks President Trump on Bloomberg Platform

It doesn't get any more transparent than this.

For anyone who doesn't already know, the Federal Reserve System is a private banking operation that controls the currency of the United States of America. The "System" issues "notes" at interest. The long-standing assumption is that the Fed is objective, impartial, and apolitical. Here's a taste of that "objectivism" from former NY Fed president, William Dudley.

(Bloomberg Opinion) -- U.S. President Donald Trump’s trade war with China keeps undermining the confidence of businesses and consumers, worsening the economic outlook. This manufactured disaster-in-the-making presents the Federal Reserve with a dilemma: Should it mitigate the damage by providing offsetting stimulus, or refuse to play along?

If the ultimate goal is a healthy economy, the Fed should seriously consider the latter approach.

Dudley states unequivocally that the President's trade policy is harmful and that the Fed should determine how to respond. Not exactly impartial, is it?

Here's more:

The Fed’s monetary policy makers typically take what happens outside their realm as a given, and then make the adjustments needed to pursue their goals of stable prices and maximum employment. They place little weight on how their actions will affect decisions in other areas, such as government spending or trade policy. The Fed, for example, wouldn’t hold back on interest-rate cuts to compel Congress to provide fiscal stimulus instead. Staying above the political fray helps the central bank maintain its independence.

So, according to conventional wisdom, if Trump’s trade war with China hurts the U.S. economic outlook, the Fed should respond by adjusting monetary policy accordingly — in this case by cutting interest rates. But what if the Fed’s accommodation encourages the president to escalate the trade war further, increasing the risk of a recession? The central bank’s efforts to cushion the blow might not be merely ineffectual. They might actually make things worse.

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell has hinted that he is aware of the problem. At the central bank’s annual conference in Jackson Hole last week, he noted that monetary policy cannot “provide a settled rulebook for international trade.” I see this as a veiled reference to the trade war, and a warning that the Fed’s tools are not well suited to mitigate the damage.

Yet the Fed could go much further. Officials could state explicitly that the central bank won’t bail out an administration that keeps making bad choices on trade policy, making it abundantly clear that Trump will own the consequences of his actions.

Again, Dudley appears to favor the Federal Reserve acting in a manner that runs contrary to the policy of the president. While that may be objective, it is hardly impartial...

...and it gets worse:

Such a harder line could benefit the Fed and the economy in three ways. First, it would discourage further escalation of the trade war, by increasing the costs to the Trump administration. Second, it would reassert the Fed’s independence by distancing it from the administration’s policies. Third, it would conserve much-needed ammunition, allowing the Fed to avoid further interest-rate cuts at a time when rates are already very low by historical standards.

I understand and support Fed officials’ desire to remain apolitical. But Trump’s ongoing attacks on Powell and on the institution have made that untenable. Central bank officials face a choice: enable the Trump administration to continue down a disastrous path of trade war escalation, or send a clear signal that if the administration does so, the president, not the Fed, will bear the risks — including the risk of losing the next election.

There’s even an argument that the election itself falls within the Fed’s purview. After all, Trump’s reelection arguably presents a threat to the U.S. and global economy, to the Fed’s independence and its ability to achieve its employment and inflation objectives. If the goal of monetary policy is to achieve the best long-term economic outcome, then Fed officials should consider how their decisions will affect the political outcome in 2020.

To Dudley's globalized mind, Trump's trade policies are "disastrous" and imperil his chances at "re-election." Since when are the unelected members of the Federal Reserve experts on election politics? Dudley's remarks reek of political partisanship.

The author and editor's emails are provided here as a public service. In a sane world, Dudley's email in-box would be flooded with contrarian opinions. The world of 2019 does not seem to be particularly sane, however.

To contact the author of this story: Bill Dudley at wcdudley53@gmail.com

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mark Whitehouse at mwhitehouse1@bloomberg.net

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

Bill Dudley is a senior research scholar at Princeton University’s Center for Economic Policy Studies. He served as president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York from 2009 to 2018, and as vice chairman of the Federal Open Market Committee. He was previously chief U.S. economist at Goldman Sachs.

Other than the yield curve re-inverting and stocks reversing course midday, nothing much happened in the world of investing on Tuesday.

At the Close, Tuesday, August 27, 2019:
Dow Jones Industrial Average: 25,777.90, -120.93 (-0.47%)
NASDAQ: 7,826.95, -26.79 (-0.34%)
S&P 500: 2,869.16, -9.22 (-0.32%)
NYSE Composite: 12,474.05, -45.57 (-0.36%)

Dow Gains For 8th Straight Day; Tuesday Data Reads Important

Stocks started the week on a strong note, only to see the rally fade as the session wore on, leaving the indices with marginal gains, led by the Dow Industrials with a 0.27% rise, the eighth straight trading day in which the Dow has recorded a positive close.

Higher by 163 points in the 11:00 am hour, Dow stocks gave back nearly 100 points, or roughly two-fifths of their value by the end of the day.

With most major companies having already reported first quarter earnings, this may turn into a rather dull week, though Tuesday's trifecta of economic data releases - NY Fed Manufacturing, Retail Sales, and Durable Goods - may provide suitable trading fodder.

On Wednesday, Macy's (M) reports prior to the market open, while Cisco Systems (CSCO) reports after the close.

Thursday may be the most impactful session, as retailers Wal-Mart (WMT), Nordstrom (JWN), and JC Penney (JCP) each report before the opening bell.

Thus far, nearly at the halfway point of the month, "sell in May" has not been the preferred trading regimen. Rather, a family strong counter-rally has been tearing along, leaving the Dow at its best level in nearly two months.

Dow Jones Industrial Average May Scorecard:

Date	Close	Gain/Loss	Cum. G/L
5/1/18	24,099.05	-64.10	-64.10
5/2/18	23,924.98	-174.07	-238.17
5/3/18	23,930.15	+5.17	-233.00
5/4/18	24,262.51	+332.36	+99.36
5/7/18	24,357.32	+94.81	+194.17
5/8/18	24,360.21	+2.89	+197.06
5/9/18	24,542.54	+182.33	+379.39
5/10/18	24,739.53	+196.99	+576.38
5/11/18	24,831.17	+91.64	+668.02
5/14/18	24,899.41	+68.24	+736.26

At the Close, Monday, May 14, 2018:
Dow Jones Industrial Average: 24,899.41, +68.24 (+0.27%)
NASDAQ: 7,411.32, +8.43 (+0.11%)
S&P 500: 2,730.13, +2.41 (+0.09%)
NYSE Composite: 12,772.04, +10.22 (+0.08%)

Stocks Continue Falling As March Commences With 420-Point Drop

After a brutal February, which took the Dow down by more than 1100 points, the first day of March suggested that more capital carnage may still be yet to come.

After a shaky positive start to the session, stocks quickly reversed course at midday after remarks by NY Fed head, William Dudley, and Fed Chair Jerome Powell signaled that the Fed would be pursuing three, and possibly, four, rate hikes in 2018. Accelerating the decline was the announcement by President Trump that he planned to impose 25% tariffs on imported steel and a 10% tag on imported aluminum.

Added to the losses of the last two sessions of February, Thursday's 420-point decline has ripped 1100 points off the Dow and futures are pointing to a lower open on Wall Street after stocks in Asia (NIKKEI, -542.83; Hang Seng, -460.80) were hit hard and European bourses have opened hard to the downside with Germany's DAX the biggest loser, down more than two percent at midday.

The Dow continues to cruise closer to correction territory, though it is still another 1000 points away, at 23,594, but, as seen in previous sessions, that amount of loss can occur in one or two sessions with relatively little resistance.

Current conditions suggest that economies globally are contracting, after a binge of easy credit field by central bank intervention and wanton money-printing for the past nine years. If the Fed and other central banks are convinced those policies must come to an end, an all-encompassing crash in the not-so-distant future is not out of the question.

Dow Jones Industrial Average March Scorecard:

Date	Close	Gain/Loss	Cum. G/L
3/1/18	24,608.98	-420.22	-420.22

At the Close, Thursday, March 1, 2018:
Dow Jones Industrial Average: 24,608.98, -420.22 (-1.68%)
NASDAQ: 7,180.56, -92.45 (-1.27%)
S&P 500: 2,677.67: -36.16 (-1.33%)
NYSE Composite: 12,518.73, -133.82 (-1.06%)

First Red Day of 2018 is Laughable

Major US indices had their first negative day of the year on Wednesday, but the losses amounted to nothing more than rounding errors.

Stocks were off early in the day after reports that Japan and China were reducing their purchases of US treasury bonds, but the notion was simply shrugged off by the equity captains as buyers emerged to limit the losses.

Stocks have gain six of the first seven trading days of 2018, a trend that is likely to continue until central banks cease buying stocks outright. This story is getting rather stale, even though most Americans fail to realize that their pensions and 401k profits are being fueled by cash injections from the Bank of Japan, European Central Bank, Swiss National Bank, Bank of England, People's Bank of China, and, the US Federal Reserve.

To believe that the Fed, being the world's most influential central bank, is not engaged in the purchase of stocks - either outright through their trading desk at the NY Fed or through member banks such as Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America and others - is to suspend reality.

Global markets have neither seen nor experienced anything like this unprecedented and outrageous activity by financial sources which create money at will, the ramifications of which are likely to result in a massive, destructive inflationary hyper-spiral.

Here in the US and across the pond in Europe, central bankers openly wring their hands and express concern that inflation is too low, when in fact the worldwide money supply - the lone reliable barometer of excess liquidity - has been increased by trillions of dollars during the post-crisis era which began in March of 2009.

Nearly nine years have passed since the great financial crisis and the excesses have only grown, reaching monstrous proportions. For what other reason would gold and silver be suppressed so virulently other than to eliminate their standing as real money? Why are governments so intent on clamping down on cryptocurrencies? Central banks do not want competition in currencies.

It is clear that the central banks of the world have pulled the global economy into a fully fiat regime, printing money backed by nothing at an unprecedented pace.

Future historians and economists - if there is indeed a future at the end of this madness - will look upon this era as one of rampant money creation by policy-makers whose only aim is to keep the failed economies of developed nations in endless debt.

The idea that the Federal Reserve wishes to "normalize" interest rates is a laughable concept. Doing so would only facilitate the ballooning of debt everywhere, to utterly unplayable levels.

Enjoy the ride.

At the Close, Wednesday, January 10, 2018:
Dow: 25,369.13, -16.67 (-0.07%)
NASDAQ: 7,153.57, -10.01 (-0.14%)
S&P 500: 2,748.23, -3.06 (-0.11%)
NYSE Composite: 13,106.60, -14.24 (-0.11%)

Market Reverses Following Fed Minutes Release

The markets opened with ebullience after NY Fed President Bill Dudley's comments suggested that the Federal Reserve was not considering any major policy changes, with the Dow reaching the highs of the day - the Dow gaining 155 points - between 10:00 and 11:00 am EDT.

All of a sudden, when Fed Chairman, speaking before the congressional Joint Economic Committee, didn't absolutely rule out that the Fed could begin tapering bond purchases before Labor Day, stocks took an abrupt U-turn, but stabilized in positive territory.

Upon the release of minutes from the Fed's April policy meeting, however, things began to get ugly. The minutes revealed that some members of the FOMC thought they should be tapering - or easing - right away or as early as their June meeting, considering the effects of the program and how the economy seemed to have been improving.

That had a chilling effect on the trading floor, as volume picked up, and stock prices headed south in one of the most volatile sessions in some time - a full 276-point round-trip on the Dow industrials. The other major indices followed suit and actually recorded worse losses, on a percentage basis.

Today's key reversal was a triple-engulfing variety, eclipsing the highs and lows of the three previous sessions, and that, to chartists everywhere, screams of directional bias, in this case, to the downside.

Whether or not traditional chart theory will hold water in this artificial liquidity environment is anybody's guess, because stocks have shown recently an uncanny ability to disregard any kind of bad news, though this kind of news - that the Fed might be pulling back the punch bowl from the drunken, leveraged party that is Wall Street - is of a different nature altogether.

As far as bull and bear markets are concerned, we're still a far cry from calling a turn, though tomorrow, the bull's reign will be entering its 51st month and stocks have just exhibited the kind of explosive move to the upside that is indicative of final tops. The coming days, weeks and months will be critical if only to ascertain whether this move is a one-day event, the beginning of a short-term correction or the start of a bear market.

Key factors to consider in today's movement were volume - one of the highest of the year - the advance-decline line and how meaningfully traders will take the mixed messages from various Fed officials.

Another insight is how fruitless the markets have become, when the only pertinent news concerns whether or not the Fed will keep accommodating the broken banks and brokerages with historical low interest rates, which incidentally, shot higher today, the 10-year breaking through the 2.0% yield mark.

Even more important is whether the Fed is actually planning to take its foot off the gas soon or is blowing more hot air, i.e., jawboning the market.

Considering the relative performance of the US economy (sluggish at best) and the consequences of tightening policy even a little bit from this unprecedentedly-accommodative posture it might be best to take a wait-and-see attitude toward the markets in general. Rather than an abrupt, decisive move to the downside (though it could very well happen), some sideways movements in the markets would seem to make more sense, at least until there is clarity on Fed policy, along with a host of other potential market-moving issues.

Dow 15,307.17, -80.41 (0.52%)
NASDAQ 3,463.30, -38.82 (1.11%)
S&P 500 1,655.35, -13.81 (0.83%)
NYSE Composite 9,501.99, -96.28 (1.00%)
NASDAQ Volume 2,058,095,625
NYSE Volume 4,350,662,000
Combined NYSE & NASDAQ Advance - Decline: 1555-4990
Combined NYSE & NASDAQ New highs - New lows: 753-35
WTI crude oil: 94.28, -1.90
Gold: 1,367.40, -10.20
Silver: 22.47, +0.017

No POMO, Stocks Down; B of A Putbacks Slam Stocks

Playing the market has become so simple. If the Fed supplies liquidity, buy. If they don't sell, but you should do those things a day ahead of time, and, of course, there are no guarantees, as computers running complex algorithms control 70-80% of the trading and the other 20-30% is handled by crooks, swindlers, fast-buck operators and con men.

Today's slide was exacerbated by problems for America's favorite deceitful banking interest, Bank of America, as reports emerged that various parties, from PIMCO to the NY Fed's Maiden Lane entity, are seeking putbacks against the company for many of the bogus MBS it has floated over the years. In a nutshell, now that 20% or more of the loans in various mortgage-backed securities are non-performing and the bank can't keep up with foreclosures and reselling of properties, the investors want their money back.

A consortium has hinted at a lawsuit in a letter to the bank, with more lawsuits surely to follow from parties as diverse as class-actions on behalf of defrauded homeowners to state AGs from across the country in a smorgasbord of civil and criminal actions. BofA has turned from a lending bank to a punching bag overnight, though the process has taken years and was mostly self-inflicted. Of course, BofA is not alone, though they may be singled out for the bulk of the abuse. JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Citigroup have similar issues that will be called out in due time.

The hour of the banks final reckoning is upon us, finally, and the criminals are circling the wagons. Within days, we should see executives lawyering up, though Attorney General Eric Holder remains ominously silent and disgraced. Our federal Attorney General should be immediately forced to step down for he has allowed a criminal enterprise to flourish within the banking community without even the hint of an investigation or subpoena.

Dow 10,978.62, -165.07 (1.48%)
NASDAQ 2,436.95, -43.71 (1.76%)
S&P 500 1,165.90, -18.81 (1.59%)
NYSE Composite 7,423.65, -147.45 (1.95%)

Losers finished well ahead of gainers, 5335-1164. New highs came down quite a bit, but still led new lows, 253-30. Obviously, there was some bottom fishing going on, as the new lows number should have been at least double what it was. Of course, considering the abundance of reporting and statistical issues facing the markets, all figures must be viewed with extreme cynicism and skepticism. Volume was quite strong, not to the bulls liking, indicating that this downdraft might be just the first of an October surprise swoon which almost everybody - except the genius analysts on CNBC - has expected.

NASDAQ Volume 2,256,866,500
NYSE Volume 6,293,440,000

Equities were joined by many commodities in the sell-off. Crude Oil for November delivery fell $3.59, to $79.49, a nearly 4.5% loss. Gold was smacked back to reality with a $36.10 loss, to $1,336.00. Silver responded in kind, losing 63 cents, to $23.78.

The banks are walking face-first into a tsunami of lawsuits. High-powered class action lawyers are looking into the potential for a nationwide class action in which the major banks - JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America Wells Fargo and Citigroup - would be defendants.

This Bloomberg story details the sordid side of MERS, named in lawsuits across the country. MERS (Mortgage elctronic Registry System) is a computerized registry which avoids filing mortgage assignments in county offices. It was founded, funded and maintained by a consortium of major lending institutions as well as government entities, Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac.

Another story, this one from Salon, citing numerous sources, including University of Utah Law Professor Christopher Peterson in the Summer 2010 University of Cincnnati Law Review. Peterson isolates MERS and puts it squarrely at the root of the entire mortgage miasma, dating back to its roots in 1995. The company and its practices are largely behind the entire securitization process, which, according to Peterson, obliterates chain of title and among other rights, standing in foreclosure actions.

Fraudclosure continues. Here's Barry Ritholz and Chris Whalen on Larry Kudlow's show Monday night discussing various scenarios on how the situation will be resolved: