Strangely enough, the skyrocketing NASDAQ took a serve turn for the worse on Friday, dropping a massive 113 points at the same time the Dow was setting a new record with an 89-point gain and the NYSE Composite tacked on 65 points.
What drove the NASDAQ to its knees on Friday were the stocks known as FAANGs - Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Google - taking hits to their massively-overvalued share prices.
Here's the ugly reality
Facebook (FB) -5.11 (-3.30%); Apple (AAPL) -6.01 (-3.88%); Amazon (AMZN) -31.96 (-3.16%); Netflix (NFLX) -7.85 (-4.73%); Alphabet (parent of Google) (GOOG) -33.58 (-3.41%).
One-day, three-to-five-percent declines in any equity is usually a big deal. Having all of these institutionally-widely held stocks take a nosedive like that on a single day is a large, red, flashing warning sign that something is fundamentally wrong with the market, the economy, maybe even the world.
These shares weren't dumped all at once because somebody was taking profits. Volume was three times normal. Everybody was booking gains, and probably with good reason. The price/earning ratios for these tech darlings are unsustainable. Netflix leads the way with a P/E of 204, followed by Amazon, at 184, according to Yahoo Finance. Google seems modest by comparison, at 32. Facebook is 38, and Apple looks downright cheap with a P/E around 17.
So, only two of these stocks are wickedly overpriced, using standard metrics, but they all suffer some similar characteristics: They are all tech companies, based on the West coast, run by billionaire founders (excepting Apple, though Tim Cook was surely an heir apparent to Steve Jobs). The only other company that comes to mind with these characteristics is Microsoft (MSFT). The company founded by Bill Gates took a pretty good hit on Friday, down 1.63 (-2.27%).
Does this suggest that the "big one" is about to shake out the left coast, battering California from LA to San Jose with aftershocks up the coast to Seattle? And just how would anybody know that? OK, that theory falls into the category of tin-foil hat conspiracy theory, but, if Cali shakes, rattles and rolls someday soon, Money Daily will take credit for calling it (that's a joke, son).
Outside of Friday's tumult, general economic data has not been encouraging. First quarter GDP was 1.2% (second estimate), which is pretty close to stall speed. The US - and largely the global - economy has been anything but robust since the Great Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008-09. Captains of finance at places like the World Bank, the Fed, ECB, and elsewhere have been touting "recovery" for eight years, wherein none, in fact, has occurred, unless one peers only at stock charts all day. While stocks have soared on easy money accommodation, he same cannot be said of Main Street's outlook. Retail stores are closing everywhere in America, small business has already been dumped into the trash bin of history, and new company creation has hit a 27-year low. Additionally, the Fed is hell-bent on raising rates for the second time this year when the FOMC meets on Tuesday and Wednesday of this week.
What's troubling about the fall of the FAANGs is that these companies have largely benefitted off the backs of consumers, monopolizing markets and cannibalizing profits to the C-suite executives. Now, the largest shareholders - pension, mutual, and hedge funds - may be taking their money elsewhere, either to cash, bonds, or, maybe just to more stolid, established, dividend-paying stocks. It's tough to know, groupthink among the elites being difficult to gauge or define.
Whatever the case, with the smallish losses on the Dow and S&P earlier in the week followed by a fallout in the most speculative stocks establishes a trend, which, for now, we can only identify as "shaky."
With most stocks and indices hovering near all-time highs, shaky is not a word one would normally associate with risk-taking. The time to run is when the avalanche is first seen at the top of the mountain, not when it barrels into the lodge.
At the Close, 6/9/17:
Dow: 21,271.97, +89.44 (0.42%)
NASDAQ 6,207.92, -113.85 (-1.80%)
S&P 500 2,431.77, -2.02 (-0.08%)
NYSE Composite: 11,744.73, +65.78 (0.56%)
For the Week:
Dow: +65.68 (0.31%)
NASDAQ: -97.88 (-1.55%)
S&P 500: -7.30 (-0.30%)
NYSE Composite: +26.03 (0.22%)
Monday, June 12, 2017
Saturday, June 10, 2017
Thursday, June 8, 2017
Something Is Not Working And It's Called Price Discovery
On Thursday, stocks closed the day essentially flat, with the exception of the NASDAQ, which seems to go up continually, no matter what the news, data or geopolitical conditions.
Oil slipped a little after being pumped and dumped. Precious metals were slammed without mercy, another annoying feature of the central banking control clique.
There seems to be a missing mechanism somewhere in this busted system, such as the one that transfers money from corporations to worthy shareholders or that can actually present a rational value for gold and silver.
It's called price discovery and there hasn't been an honest mechanism for such since 2009, probably earlier.
Like everything else, including the senate testimony of one former FBI Director James Comey, the stock market is built upon a mountain of flimsy propositions, most of which make little to no economic sense, unless, of course, one believes that borrowing insane amounts of money and printing even more will bring prosperity.
Hogwash.
At the Close, 6/8/17:
Dow: 21,182.53, +8.84 (0.04%)
NASDAQ: 6,321.76, +24.38 (0.39%)
S&P 500 2,433.79, +0.65 (0.03%)
NYSE Composite: 11,676.79, +9.06 (0.08%)
Oil slipped a little after being pumped and dumped. Precious metals were slammed without mercy, another annoying feature of the central banking control clique.
There seems to be a missing mechanism somewhere in this busted system, such as the one that transfers money from corporations to worthy shareholders or that can actually present a rational value for gold and silver.
It's called price discovery and there hasn't been an honest mechanism for such since 2009, probably earlier.
Like everything else, including the senate testimony of one former FBI Director James Comey, the stock market is built upon a mountain of flimsy propositions, most of which make little to no economic sense, unless, of course, one believes that borrowing insane amounts of money and printing even more will bring prosperity.
Hogwash.
At the Close, 6/8/17:
Dow: 21,182.53, +8.84 (0.04%)
NASDAQ: 6,321.76, +24.38 (0.39%)
S&P 500 2,433.79, +0.65 (0.03%)
NYSE Composite: 11,676.79, +9.06 (0.08%)
Crude Oil Sinks on Continuing Glut, Slack Demand, Alternatives
While stocks have zigzagged and gone nowhere the first three days of the week, oil has been more consistent in direction, with WTI crude dropping by two dollars a barrel on Wednesday under $46, a nine-month low.
There's been a glut of oil on world markets for some time now, but it's been especially painful to producers since the market riggers lost control in 2015, sending the price from imaginary levels - forced upon the planet by the myth of "peak oil" - around $100 per barrel to where it stands today.
Oil's recent swoon brings up a good question. With all the oil sloshing around and a myriad of factors leading to lessened use of the "fossil fuel," what exactly is fair value for crude?
There are many arguments with which to weigh the answer, whatever that may be, but one element that is undeniable about the current condition, is that producing nations aren't exactly in love with what they're being paid for a barrel of the slippery stuff. That's because many of the producers - OPEC and Middle East nations, primarily - had budgeted for steady sales around the high-water mark of $100/barrel.
Since that price turned out to be completely unsustainable, these countries have had to adjust their spending and programs, leading to some degree of discontent among their citizens. Americans, who benefitted from fracking and shale drilling, have been the biggest beneficiaries, seeing the price of a gallon of gas fall from an average near four dollars to today's prices in the low two dollar range.
One of the largest factors contributing to the glut is purely demographic. Many established economies - Japan, US, Europe - are aging, and older people simply don't drive as much. Add to that the improvements in fuel economy, plus alternatives such as cars which run on natural gas or electricity and he trend becomes more pronounced.
As the price of crude continues under pressure, alternative fuels, such as increased use of coal, solar, and wind in the United States, will only exacerbate the condition.
Back in the good old days of the 70s and 80s, oil used to be under $20 per barrel. Then along came the "peak oil" sham, which sent the price through the roof and consumers to the poorhouse. The true price may or may not be found in the current regime of futures prices, a system that has and probably continues to be gamed, but the real price, taking into account the massive amounts of oil on and off the market, the stagnation of the global economy, and emerging alternatives, is likely to be found at levels well below what it is pinned at today.
Try thinking of oil at about $32-36 per barrel and gasoline at $1.60 and you're probably on the right track.
At the Close, 6/7/17:
Dow: 21,173.69, +37.46 (0.18%)
NASDAQ 6,297.38, +22.32 (0.36%)
S&P 500 2,433.14, +3.81 (0.16%)
NYSE Composite: 11,667.73, -3.73 (-0.03%)
There's been a glut of oil on world markets for some time now, but it's been especially painful to producers since the market riggers lost control in 2015, sending the price from imaginary levels - forced upon the planet by the myth of "peak oil" - around $100 per barrel to where it stands today.
Oil's recent swoon brings up a good question. With all the oil sloshing around and a myriad of factors leading to lessened use of the "fossil fuel," what exactly is fair value for crude?
There are many arguments with which to weigh the answer, whatever that may be, but one element that is undeniable about the current condition, is that producing nations aren't exactly in love with what they're being paid for a barrel of the slippery stuff. That's because many of the producers - OPEC and Middle East nations, primarily - had budgeted for steady sales around the high-water mark of $100/barrel.
Since that price turned out to be completely unsustainable, these countries have had to adjust their spending and programs, leading to some degree of discontent among their citizens. Americans, who benefitted from fracking and shale drilling, have been the biggest beneficiaries, seeing the price of a gallon of gas fall from an average near four dollars to today's prices in the low two dollar range.
One of the largest factors contributing to the glut is purely demographic. Many established economies - Japan, US, Europe - are aging, and older people simply don't drive as much. Add to that the improvements in fuel economy, plus alternatives such as cars which run on natural gas or electricity and he trend becomes more pronounced.
As the price of crude continues under pressure, alternative fuels, such as increased use of coal, solar, and wind in the United States, will only exacerbate the condition.
Back in the good old days of the 70s and 80s, oil used to be under $20 per barrel. Then along came the "peak oil" sham, which sent the price through the roof and consumers to the poorhouse. The true price may or may not be found in the current regime of futures prices, a system that has and probably continues to be gamed, but the real price, taking into account the massive amounts of oil on and off the market, the stagnation of the global economy, and emerging alternatives, is likely to be found at levels well below what it is pinned at today.
Try thinking of oil at about $32-36 per barrel and gasoline at $1.60 and you're probably on the right track.
At the Close, 6/7/17:
Dow: 21,173.69, +37.46 (0.18%)
NASDAQ 6,297.38, +22.32 (0.36%)
S&P 500 2,433.14, +3.81 (0.16%)
NYSE Composite: 11,667.73, -3.73 (-0.03%)
Wednesday, June 7, 2017
A Disturbance in the Farce? Stocks End Lower Second Straight Session
Stocks turn red for the second straight session, this being the first full week of June, suggesting that there may be a revised adage for the new Wall Street, "Sell in June and avoid the swoon?"
Obviously, two days of smallish losses does not constitute a trend. Three days might. A close on the Dow below 20,600 would. Not only would that be a nearly three percent decline (OMG!), but it would be below the previous low close, a line of demarcation that could signal the oncoming of a bear market.
Those who deny the possibility of a bear market are either under the age of eight and have never seen what one looks like, or has forgotten prior bear markets, which generally occur when stocks are overstretched, overvalued and/or overbought.
To imagine that after eight years of somewhat spectacular gains that investors might disinvest and actually pull some of their support from the lofty prices of stocks on the Dow, NASDAQ, S&P, et. al., is not so far-fetched. It's happened before. It will, in all likelihood, happen again.
Trying to time such an event is the task of fools. With the FOMC ready to raise interest rates again, despite the incongruous activity in the bond markets (10-year-note yield at seven month lows, 2.15%), continued declines may become not a nuisance, but a feature this summer, one of the big hits that Hollywood will miss completely.
At The Close, 6/6/17:
Dow: 21,136.23, -47.81 (-0.23%)
NASDAQ 6,275.06, -20.63 (-0.33%)
S&P 500 2,429.33, -6.77 (-0.28%)
NYSE Composite: 11,671.46, -22.22 (-0.19%)
Obviously, two days of smallish losses does not constitute a trend. Three days might. A close on the Dow below 20,600 would. Not only would that be a nearly three percent decline (OMG!), but it would be below the previous low close, a line of demarcation that could signal the oncoming of a bear market.
Those who deny the possibility of a bear market are either under the age of eight and have never seen what one looks like, or has forgotten prior bear markets, which generally occur when stocks are overstretched, overvalued and/or overbought.
To imagine that after eight years of somewhat spectacular gains that investors might disinvest and actually pull some of their support from the lofty prices of stocks on the Dow, NASDAQ, S&P, et. al., is not so far-fetched. It's happened before. It will, in all likelihood, happen again.
Trying to time such an event is the task of fools. With the FOMC ready to raise interest rates again, despite the incongruous activity in the bond markets (10-year-note yield at seven month lows, 2.15%), continued declines may become not a nuisance, but a feature this summer, one of the big hits that Hollywood will miss completely.
At The Close, 6/6/17:
Dow: 21,136.23, -47.81 (-0.23%)
NASDAQ 6,275.06, -20.63 (-0.33%)
S&P 500 2,429.33, -6.77 (-0.28%)
NYSE Composite: 11,671.46, -22.22 (-0.19%)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
