Federal Reserve's QE Today is The Big Short Revisited in a Bigger Manner

Steve Carell and Ryan Gosling in scene from "The Big Short"

On the first trading day of 2020, stocks advanced sharply, fueled by naked capitalism and the desire to not miss out on any profitable opportunity.

That's the truth of the matter, usually every day, so long as the Federal Reserve continues to pump fresh capital into the already bloated financial system. The trouble with the Fed's desire to keep Wall Street flush with cash is that enriching a small number of already-wealthy people hasn't had the desired effect of "trickling down" to the general population.

It didn't work when the Fed rescued the financial system in 2007-09, hasn't since, and won't in the future. Known generally as QE (Quantitative Easing) it's a failed policy that produces nothing other than overpriced financial assets, monstrous bubbles, and eventually, mass damage to the very system it's purported to be protecting. Since September of last year (2019) the Fed has already pumped nearly a trillion dollars into the Wall Street casino and it's balance sheet has exploded by another $500 billion.

To say that the Fed's promotion of QE is as bad as the systemic fraud that ran rampant within the sub-prime mortgage bundling that triggered the GFC in 2007-09 might be taking the comparison a step too far, but it surely is worth nominal consideration.
The players are mostly the same: Wall Street tycoons representing trading firms of the biggest banks bent on maximizing profits, relaxed, corrupted, and often incompetent regulators, an unsuspecting public that eventually gets fleeced.

In comparison to the sub-prime hustle, the rollers and managers of the mortgage bundling are now - as before - manned by the trading desks of the big Wall Street firms. The Fed is the enabler, a la the ratings agencies during sub-prime, and mouth-breathing borrowers with low credit scores seeking to purchase a home are replaced today by anybody participating in a pension fund, college fund, 401k or other managed investment vehicle. That's why sub-prime was called the housing bubble and the ongoing, current arrangement is called the "everything bubble." Everything is up for grabs and everything is at stake.

This all has been tied together neatly since the GFC, as, after $750 billion in TARP was exhausted, three bouts of QE commenced, secret loans from the Fed to foreign banks were proffered, and nobody of any importance went to jail over the excesses of the sub-prime boom and subsequent bust. Nobody. They're mostly all still there, having cashed mammoth bonus checks provided by the TARP bailout, plotting the next windfall.

Lewis' book is revealing and riveting,
available everywhere, for a song.

Michael Lewis' great book, The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine, and the movie it spawned, The Big Short, offer a reveal of just what happened in the run-up to the sub-prime crisis and how a number of smart and/or lucky investors were able to capitalize on the general greed, stupidity, and fraud perpetrated by wall Street banks.

In the film, Ryan Gosling plays Jared Vennett, the fictional character based on the real-life Deutsche Bank trader, Greg Lippman. Christian Bale plays the real-life Michael Burry, the Scion Asset Management leader who risked his firm and cashed in when MBS and CDOs went bust, but the lion of the story comes n the character of Mark Baum (Steve Eisman in real life) played passionately by Steve Carell as the angry, perplexed head of Frontline Partners, the independent Morgan Stanley trading unit that bet against CDOs and made millions in the sub-prime collapse.

Carell, as Mark Baum, sets up the character and the film's premise in his first scene, railing against big banks charging outrageous fees for overdrafts. His defiant, conflicted, crusading manner defined, Carell storms through the film wide-eyed and aghast at what's about to happen to the global financial structure, outspoken and often outrageous. Nearing the end, he - and the character of Ben Rickert (based on real life, former JP Morgan trader, Ben Hockett, and portrayed in a sublimated, almost solemn manner by Brad Pitt) - realizes that he is betting on the collapse of the bedrock of global finance, the US housing industry, and trillions of dollars will be lost, millions of people will lose homes. The fate of the world weighs heavy upon him.

The Big Short film is well worth watching again, as is a thorough reading of the original Michael Lewis book by the same name. In case you haven't seen the movie or read the book, this qualifies as a MUST, if you have money at risk in any kind of investment because it all is happening again, in a different venue, on an even larger, more obscene scale. Sub-prime took years to grow, metastasize and engulf the financial system. The ongoing "everything bubble," with pension and other long-term passive investments as the target, will literally take decades, and it's already well underway.

It's all happening again in a bigger and more destructive way and it's happening right NOW.

The book and film are available at screaming low prices on Ebay, Amazon and various streaming services (for the film). A purchase is likely to be some of the best investment money ever spent and an understanding of the process will reveal the fraud and deceit being parlayed right beneath the public's noses. Both the book and the film are revealing, frightening, and true.

EDIT: Money Daily may not always be on top of the news, but today's major blast posting may turn out to be prescient. Just moments ago, Wall Street On Parade, the noteworthy blog published by Wall Street insiders, Russ and Pam Martens, released a related post: The Doomsday Machine Returns: Citibank Has Sold Protection On $858 Billion of Credit Default Swaps. In the article, the writers contend that the dark doom of 2008 may be hanging over the canyons of Wall Street once again, as not just Citibank, but JP Morgan Chase as well, have taken big positions in Credit Default Swaps "that are being used to reignite the synthetic Collateralized Loan Obligation (synthetic CDO) market - which vastly added to the leverage that blew up Wall Street in 2008."

Stay tuned.

A few choice clips from the film:







At the Close, Thursday, January 2, 2020:
Dow Jones Industrial Average: 28,868.80, +330.36 (+1.16%)
NASDAQ: 9,092.19, +119.58 (+1.33%)
S&P 500: 3,257.85, +27.07 (+0.84%)
NYSE Composite: 14,002.49, +89.46 (+0.64%)

Monday Push-ups; How the Dow Jones Industrial Average Makes New Highs

Players, speculators and people with more money than they know what to do with stepped up on Monday to buy the dip created when all four major indices closed in the red last week.

Such action is like stepping on a pile of dog poo, wiping it off and stepping into it again. The insanity of investors apparently has no bounds because of ever-increasing liquidity created by the Federal Reserve, the seeming limitlessness of stock buybacks by hundreds of corporations and the hunt for yield by fund managers.

This activity, while cheered on by the financial press, the mainstream press and every other value-clueless pundit of the wonders of free market capitalism, cannot continue without some reckoning, not perhaps a final one, but at least a corrective phase. What happened in October and December of last year has apparently been forgotten, as investors piled into stocks with abandon in this holiday-shortened trading week.

Markets will be closed on Thanksgiving Thursday and close early (1:00 pm ET) on Black Friday, the day celebrated as an orgy of spending and holiday shopping, replete with door-busting deals and the associated mayhem and violence that stems from hundreds of people trying to get into stores earliest to grab oversized TVs, plastic junk from the Republic of China, and other goods marked as low as 50-80% off.

Winning days on Wall Street have - over the course of the last 10 years or so - become something of a yawn-fest, as stocks breached record highs on numerous occasions every year since the Great Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008. Higher stock prices are to be expected. They are the norm, but nobody wants to actually look at what they're buying, only the gains they're making. It's almost as if the companies in which people are investing will return massive profits for 100 years or longer, or that the 30 stocks comprising the Dow Industrials will never change (they do, and frequently).

Beginning with AIG being dropped from the Dow in September of 2008, 10 companies have been either ousted, merged and/or replaced in the world's leading index. That's a third of the companies. No wonder it's at record highs. The bad companies - the latest being General Electric (GE) - are replaced with companies with better growth potential and the capacity for higher share prices. It would be like lowering the height of the basket a few inches every year for LeBron James. Upon reaching 40 years of age, the NBA superstar could dunk without jumping or even reaching up very high.

For today, the NBA basket is still 10 feet off the floor, but the mastery of financial deception belongs in those goal-post movers on the executive board of Dow Jones.

At the Close, Monday, November 25, 2019:
Dow Jones Industrial Average: 28,066.47, +190.85 (+0.68%)
NASDAQ: 8,632.49, +112.60 (+1.32%)
S&P 500: 3,133.64, +23.35 (+0.75%)
NYSE Composite: 13,532.89, +91.94 (+0.68%)

WEEKEND WRAP: PayPal Credit/Synchrony Update; All About Friday and George Carlin FTW

It was an oddly calm week on Wall Street, as stocks barely budged Monday through Thursday.

Not to disappoint, however, Friday saw the three major indices break through the doldrums and reach all-time record closing highs. Huzzah!

Friday's ramp was due to one thing and one thing only: the promise (again) of a US-China trade deal. There wasn't one. There was the promise of one, and that's all it took to send stocks soaring again.

Being skeptical of the one-day wonder of new highs in the stock market is not a crime. It takes a rational person to recognize that stocks are overvalued, and have been for maybe the past six years. The Fed keeps pumping fresh cash into the system, the corporations continue buying back their own stock and the media continues to promote the breakthrough in trade negotiations between the United State and China.

Presto! New highs.

Without the assistance of Friday's gains, for the week, the Dow would have been up 100 points, but, the NASDAQ would have gained less than four points, the S&P would have been up three points and change, and the NYSE Composite would actually have registered a loss of 15 points. TGIF, indeed.

At the Close, Friday, November 15, 2019:
Dow 30: 28,004.89, +222.93 (+0.80%)
NASDAQ: 8,540.83, +61.81 (+0.73%)
S&P 500: 3,120.46, +23.83 (+0.77%)
NYSE Composite: 13,492.96, +100.96 (+0.75%)

For the Week:
Dow 30: +323.65 (+1.17%)
NASDAQ: +65.52 (+0.77%)
S&P 500: +27.38 (+0.89)
NYSE Composite: +85.16 (+0.64%)

On to more stupid banking tricks, such as Money Daily's recent enquiry into the continuing consumer-fleecing practices of the banking industry. This was covered in the post Scam Alert: PayPal Credit and Synchrony Financial Playing Hide and Seek with Special financing Purchase Offers

It's not enough that banks and credit card companies charge what were once considered usurious interest rates to their customers. No, their 18, 22.5, 26.75 percent interest rates are not enough. They need to offer zero percent interest Special Financing Purchases, of which Money Daily discussed at length last week - to lure consumers into even more debt with these offers. Of the most egregious and widespread is the offer of zero percent interest for six months if the purchase is paid in full, a device employed by PayPal Credit through Synchony Financial, which handles the details online.

Such offers are widespread on eBay and offered via emails to PayPal Credit account holders. These are bona fide offers and they are good, but, as explained in the prior article, they do not fully disclose the details, one of which is actually encoded into law, specifically, by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the agency created in the aftermath of the Great Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008, via the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which handed rule-making, incorporated in the 1968 Truth in Lending Act (TILA) over to the CFPB. 12 CFR 1026 Truth in Lending (Regulation Z, section 1026.53(b)(1)(i) and (ii)

https://www.consumerfinance.gov/policy-compliance/rulemaking/regulations/1026/53/#b

(Editor's Note: Yes, we have far too many laws. "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws." - Tacitus, 56 AD - 117 AD)

Naturally, providing a link to the regulation is not required under the disclosure rules, so the banks don't provide such a link, because doing so might cause consumers to take a moment to consider just what they're getting themselves into. Specifically, the passage does indeed spell out, succinctly, that the lender is not required to allocate payments that are beyond the required minimum payments except in the final two cycles immediately preceding the expiration of the deferred interest offer or Special Financing Purchase.

Here it is, in all its deeply-buried glory:

(b) Special rules —

(1) Accounts with balances subject to deferred interest or similar program. When a balance on a credit card account under an open-end (not home-secured) consumer credit plan is subject to a deferred interest or similar program that provides that a consumer will not be obligated to pay interest that accrues on the balance if the balance is paid in full prior to the expiration of a specified period of time:

(i) Last two billing cycles. The card issuer must allocate any amount paid by the consumer in excess of the required minimum periodic payment consistent with paragraph (a) of this section, except that, during the two billing cycles immediately preceding expiration of the specified period, the excess amount must be allocated first to the balance subject to the deferred interest or similar program and any remaining portion allocated to any other balances consistent with paragraph (a) of this section; or

(ii) Consumer request. The card issuer may at its option allocate any amount paid by the consumer in excess of the required minimum periodic payment among the balances on the account in the manner requested by the consumer.

Money Daily had reached out to various individuals expressing concern over the banking practices regarding allocation of payments. One of the people who was kind enough to respond was the media representative for Synchrony Financial, Lisa Lanspery, who responded thus:

Rick – After reading your piece entitled “Scam Alert: PayPal Credit, Synchrony Bank Playing Hide and Seek with Special Financing Purchase Offers,” I wanted to address the misleading premise of your piece.

Synchrony is committed to transparency and consumer protection. Our advertising, applications, and billing statements provide clear, concise, and comprehensive education around the consumer’s financing options, including popular promotional financing options.

On payments to a PayPal Credit account, our process is to apply any overpayments beyond the required minimum payment due to the highest interest bearing balance -- therefore excess payments are typically applied first to non-promotional balances as required by applicable law to help the customer avoid paying interest. However, if an accountholder prefers the additional payments be allocated across their bill in a different manner, they may contact customer service to do that.

For background, here is the specific language that account holders on payment allocation.

PAYMENT ALLOCATION
We will use each payment in the amount of the minimum payment due or less, first to pay billed monthly plan payments on any Easy Payments purchases, then billed interest, then billed fees, then the principal balance, and then any other amounts due.

However, if you have a balance on a deferred interest purchase, during both the billing cycle preceding its expiration date and the billing cycle in which such deferred interest purchase expires, we may use the payment, after the amount to pay billed monthly plan payments on any Easy Payments purchases, to pay the balance on such deferred interest purchase(s).

We will use any amount in excess of the minimum payment due to pay the balances with the highest interest rate, then the next highest interest rate, and so forth. However, during both the billing cycle preceding the expiration date and the billing cycle in which a deferred interest purchase expires, we may use payments first to pay the balance on such deferred interest purchase(s).

Thanks for your interest in Synchrony and getting the facts correct.

Regards,
Lisa

Lisa Lanspery
SVP, Public Relations
Synchrony

...to which Money Daily responds, "thanks Lisa, for getting the law right. You could have just directed us to Regulation Z, which you did upon request for the specific law, but may I point out that your "background" on payment allocations is incorrect. Please read the following carefully and note the words emboldened:"

during the two billing cycles immediately preceding expiration of the specified period, the excess amount must be allocated first to the balance subject to the deferred interest or similar program and any remaining portion allocated to any other balances consistent with paragraph (a) of this section

While you are correct that the credit issuer is not required, for the most part, to allocate excess payments to the "deferred interest" offering, you are incorrect about the timing of the last two cycles. They are the two cycles immediately preceding expiration of the specified period of deferred interest financing, not "both the billing cycle preceding its expiration date and the billing cycle in which such deferred interest purchase expires..." as you stated in your email correspondence.

If this is indeed the practice by which Synchrony is allocating payments, then Synchrony is in violation of the law. If, however, you simply made a misstatement of Synchrony's policy, then let's just all apologize to one another (Money Daily for being alarmist, Synchrony Financial for being a credit issuer, and you, for making a small error), sit around the campfire and sing kumbaya.

The final point is that banks and credit companies have the consumers over various barrels when it comes to financing, disclosure, rules, and, especially, lawmaking, most likely because most of the laws are written for congressional representatives - who don't understand even a third of what's contained in the laws on which they vote ("we have to pass it to see what's in it" comes to mind) - by lobbyists or lawyers for the corporate interests involved, in this case banking. They write the laws to benefit their clients, the banks, not consumers.

Whew! That's more than enough for a Sunday morning. If any readers have chosen the TL;DR option, that is completely understandable.

Please enjoy the entire 10-minute video of the late, great George Carlin, uncovering, near the end, some truth about America.

Scam Alert: PayPal Credit, Synchrony Bank Playing Hide and Seek With Special Financing Purchase Offers

by Fearless Rick Gagliano, editor, Money Daily

     When it comes to banking in general, most Americans (Europeans and Asians, as well, we might assume) are skeptical about institutional sincerity and customer care. After all, it was just a decade ago that some of the biggest banks in the world were caught up in a messy triage with overzealous rating agencies and absent regulators that sent global finance to its knees.

Since the Great Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008, there have been more than few dubious practices entertained by major banks. Wells-Fargo comes to mind, whose employees, paragons of virtue all, no doubt, opened accounts in people's names without their knowledge, among other scandalous activity.

Certainly, the annals of banking history are rife with examples of financial trickery, pandering and assorted crimes and misdemeanors carried on by monied institutions, all in the name of profit and greed.

With the advent of the internet age, banking has become more streamlined, varied and accessible to anyone with a smartphone, tablet or computer. Offerings from non-bank institutions abound. The leader among transactional vendors being PayPal, the the online business-consumer, peer-to-peer middleman company founded in part by Elon Musk, Max Levchin, and Peter Thiel made its name by offering online accounts to anybody who could "fog a mirror" and with a few nickels to rub together.

With an IPO in 2002 and subsequent acquisition by online auctioneer eBay, PayPal became the de facto standard for online payments. Reacting to a squabble from investor Carl Ichan, eBay divested itself from PayPal in 2014 and since then PayPal has been a stand-alone company. It was late in 2008 and early 2009 that PayPal, after acquiring the company known as Bill Me Later, began to offer credit to consumers. Aptly named PayPal Credit, a complete credit and debiting system aimed at the massive consumer audience worldwide was established.

Among their many marketing tactics, PayPal Credit offered a wildly popular option called special purchase financing, bearing zero interest for six months on purchases of $99 or more if paid in full during the allotted time. That promotion still exists today, but the present and recent past are where the issues of dubious claims and incomplete disclosure of terms begins.


Enter Synchrony

PayPal partnered with consumer credit giant, Synchrony Financial, to offer credit cards to PayPal account holders in 2004 and took the relationship even further in 2017, when it sold $5.8 billion in consumer credit receivables to Synchrony Financial, effectively yielding control over the operation of PayPal Credit to Synchrony.

It was around that time in 2017 that how payments on PayPal Credit accounts were allocated was altered. When parent company PayPal was operating PayPal Credit, allocations of payments on accounts were handled roughly as anything over the minimum required payment on the entire account was then allocated to the special purchase financing.

For example, a PayPal Credit account holder, with, say, $1000 existing outstanding balance and a minimum monthly payment of $40, makes a purchase for $500 and takes advantage of the Zero Interest for Six Months if Paid in Full Special Financing Purchase. When the account holder makes a payment, say $100, $40 would cover the outstanding minimum credit payment and the remaining $60 would be applied to the Special Financing Purchase. That was pretty standard, and logical.

No more. Now, when that same account holder (or any account holder) with an existing outstanding balance makes the same transaction, the entirety of his or her payment goes toward the account balance and NONE is allocated to the Special Financing Purchase until the final 60 days of said Special Financing Purchase. In the meantime, interest accrues on the Special Financing Purchase at the full amount, in our case, $500. If the Special Financing Purchase balance is not paid off in full at the expiration of the six months, all of the accrued interest becomes part of the account balance due.

Nowhere in the terms and conditions of Special Financing Purchase is this made obvious or even mentioned to consumers. It is only revealed when (as our Editor found out) one questions PayPal Credit customer support by phone or by online chat. The response to why this devious practice is maintained, is that PayPal Credit and/or Synchrony Financial uses best practices in allocating funds in this manner. It's almost a certainty that said best practices are what's best for the bank, not the consumer, and here's why:

Beyond the failure to disclose this in-house allocation rule, the bank (Synchrony, in this case), has interest accruing on that Special Financing Purchase (remember, ZERO interest for six months if paid in full) at the full amount of the purchase, not at a lesser amount if account holder payment allocations were done the old way, in a moral, reasonable, and logical manner. It also sets up the casual account holder for a shock, when he/she looks at the Special Financing Purchase and realizes that with two months left to pay off the Special Financing Purchase at Zero Percent he or she still owes the full amount.

Unless one is careful enough to scrutinize the monthly statements generated by PayPal Credit, this poor or mis-allocation of payments - done in the name of best practices - can easily go unnoticed, especially if one makes automatic or automated monthly payments, a practice which all banks and credit card companies strongly encourage.

There is some relief, maybe.

Calls to PayPal Credit on this or any credit account issue result in referral to Synchrony. The supervisor with which Money Daily spoke on Thursday, November 7, elicited the response that payments can be allocated to the Special Financing Purchase if one calls Synchrony at 1-844-373-4961 and requests the payments be directed according to the wishes of the account holder, and NOT in the manner usually employed by the BANK (Synchrony). Synchrony says they will honor such requests and process them, but allocations will not show up on online accounts for "a few days."

Additionally, none of this would apply to anybody who isn't carrying a balance (the wise and fortunate 20-30% of account holders) with PayPal Credit and the only purchase made was a Special Financing Purchase. In that case, all of the monthly payment would be applied to the deferred interest financing because that's all there is.

Therein lies the problem. Instead of doing business in a morally correct, logical, reasonable, responsible, and customer-friendly manner, Synchrony Financial has chosen the usual path of 21st century bankers: deceit, incomplete disclosure, "gotcha" terms and "special financing" with in-house rules designed to maximize the bank's profitability, the customer be damned. To do business in what would normally be considered the "best practice" for the consumer, the account holder has to go out of his or her way to make a special phone call, jump through hoops, listen to all of the recordings and prompts to get what should have been done automatically. This is, after all, the age of high-speed communications and the internet, not Ma Bell's twisted copper.

If this practice isn't illegal, it would be no shock today. Financial institutions have been afforded wide latitude in their dealings with the public, to encourage loans, credit, and debt in a wide array of products and offerings.

In a world in which sanity, fairness, and reasonableness would be the norm, this kind of operation might be considered fraud at worst, bait-and-switch at best. But today, in our world of glorification of all things money and financial, where the dollar sign is revered and worshipped, it barely registers a "lookie here." It's a sad commentary on the state of morality and banking when gigantic, faceless institutions are able to run roughshod over consumers. It goes against the public interest, an interest, incidentally, that nobody - from bankers to consumer credit agencies to politicians - seems to be even remotely interested in protecting.

So, what do you think? Is this practice just run-of-the-mill deceit and standard underhandedness by PayPal Credit and Synchrony Financial, or does it rise to or border on criminal mischief, something banking regulators or congress should address? Comments are open, and are moderated.

Anybody experiencing issues such as those outlined above should call Synchrony at 1-844-373-4961 and complain loudly.

Be polite, but overall, be careful.

UPDATE: Found a thread on the PayPal boards dealing with this very issue. Many are fuming about it.
See here: https://www.paypal-community.com/t5/PayPal-Credit/PayPal-Credit-Promotional-Payment-Allocation/m-p/1553309/highlight/false#M8392

UPDATE 11/27/19: This issue will remain, as the actions of Synchrony are guided by Regulation Z. See the updated blog post:
https://moneydaily.blogspot.com/2019/11/weekend-wrap-paypal-creditsynchrony.html

At the Close, Thursday, November 7, 2019:
Dow Jones Industrial Average: 27,674.80, +182.24 (+0.66%)
NASDAQ: 8,434.52, +23.89 (+0.28%)
S&P 500: 3,085.18, +8.40 (+0.27%)
NYSE Composite: 13,395.55, +43.98 (+0.33%)

Dow Losing Streak at Five Days; NASDAQ Resistant to Reality

After losing 84 points on Friday, the Dow extended its losing streak to five days, shedding 103 points to open the trading week. The total loss since June 11 is nothing to get excited about, a mere 335 points, less than 1 1/2 percent, but the lows set in intra-day trading both Friday and Monday were successively deeper.

Friday's low of 24,902.01, was exceeded Monday at 24,825.77, which was set just minutes into the session. The pattern of lower lows and lower closes over the past five sessions is a worrying sign to macro market watchers.

While the Dow slides, the NASDAQ continues to hold its own or make new gains, though the opening on Monday was ugly, with the NAZ down 70 points just after the bell. Today's tiny gain failed to excite anybody but the most committed bulls, who may be charging into a classic trap, with declining volume and indications from the Dow that aren't exactly encouraging.

This week got off to a poor start and there is little in the way of data to support any kind of news-driven uptick. It may turn out to be one of the duller weeks of the summer, which officially begins on Wednesday, June 20.

What's driving investors into speculative positions in the NASDAQ is the lack of positive returns from either Dow stocks or treasury bonds. The former appears too risky, with dividend yields ranging from 1.75% to 2.75% on the individual components, while the bond market continues to defy the Fed, as the 10-year note refuses to bang through the three percent mark.

Bonds barely budged today, but the yield curve tightened as the two year bill yield added one basis point to 2.56, and the 10-year slipped to 2.92, leaving the 2s-10s spread at a decade low 36 basis points.

That's a notable number, as the last time the spread was so slim was in 2007, just prior to one of the worst financial crashes in market history. As is sometimes quoted, "history may not always repeat, but it does often rhyme." Treasuries seem to be rhyming well with conditions prior to the GFC. Unrestrained credit, high leverage, overvaluation prominent in financial assets. In 2007, it was mostly hard assets, i.e., houses, that were rocketing in value. Today's only difference is that it's now stocks which are out of bounds for all but the most speculative players and plungers.

Dow Jones Industrial Average June Scorecard:

Date	Close	Gain/Loss	Cum. G/L
6/1/18	24,635.21	+219.37	+219.37
6/4/18	24,813.69	+178.48	+397.85
6/5/18	24,799.98	-13.71	+384.14
6/6/18	25,146.39	+346.41	+730.55
6/7/18	25,241.41	+95.02	+825.57
6/8/18	25,316.53	+75.12	+900.69
6/11/18	25,322.31	+5.78	+906.47
6/12/18	25,320.73	-1.58	+904.89
6/13/18	25,201.20	-119.53	+785.36
6/14/18	25,175.31	-25.89	+759.47
6/15/18	25,090.48	-84.83	+674.64
6/18/18	24,987.47	-103.01	+571.63

At the Close, Monday, June 18, 2018:
Dow Jones Industrial Average: 24,987.47, -103.01 (-0.41%)
NASDAQ: 7,747.02, +0.65 (+0.01%)
S&P 500: 2,773.87, -5.79 (-0.21%)
NYSE Composite: 12,706.73, -27.91 (-0.22%)

Rally On! Dow Regains More Than Half of February Losses

With the Dow Industrials posting the fifth straight positive session, he blue chip average has regained more than half of the losses incurred during the first six trading sessions of February.

Standing just above 25,200, the Dow has been an impressive performer following the instant, interest rate sensitive melt-down earlier in the month.

The Dow is up more than 1000 points this week, with Friday's session important as stock options reach expiration.

Last week's scare has morphed into this week's buying opportunity, as investors have scrambled back into stocks after equity funds experienced record outflows just a week prior.

Those who sold at the interim bottom may be experiencing some seller's remorse presently, though the stock market has still has some distance to travel back to all-time highs.

Has anything changed besides sentiment, which is now returning to bullishness after a spat of fear entered the minds of speculators?

Certainly, rising interest rates are a concern, with the 10-year-note reaching four-year highs. The value of the US dollar, as reflected in currency FX pairs and the Dollar Index, is another new feature of the cycle-weary market. The dollar has weakened considerably over the past 12 months and does not appear to have four support.

Higher interest rates on treasuries usually causes strengthening in the dollar, but not this time, befuddling the normally-smug bond and currency analysts. If bond yields continue to rise and the dollar does not recover substantially, then all manner of economic theory can be tossed out the proverbial window.

Whatever the case may be - not discounting the effect of accelerating volatility during the recent downturn - there remains considerable uncertainty which must somehow be resolved, either by a permanent change in market direction from bull to bear, or a continuation of the long rally off the GFC lows of 2009.

Dow Jones Industrial Average February Scorecard:

Date	Close	Gain/Loss	Cum. G/L
2/1/18	26,186.71	+37.32	+37.32
2/2/18	25,520.96	-665.75	-628.43
2/5/18	24,345.75	-1,175.21	-1,803.64
2/6/18	24,912.77	+567.02	-1,236.62
2/7/18	24,893.35	-19.42	-1,256.04
2/8/18	23,860.46	-1,032.89	-2288.93
2/9/18	24,190.90	+330.44	-1958.49
2/12/18	24,601.27	+410.37	-1548.12
2/13/18	24,640.45	+39.18	-1508.94
2/14/18	24,893.49	+253.04	-1255.90
2/15/18	25,200.37	+306.88	-949.02

At the Close, Thursday, February 15, 2018:
Dow Jones Industrial Average: 25,200.37, +306.88 (+1.23%)
NASDAQ: 7,256.43, +112.81 (+1.58%)
S&P 500: 2,731.20, +32.57 (+1.21%)
NYSE Composite: 12,856.87, +110.15 (+0.86%)

Don't Count on a Market Correction in this Environment

For a change, stocks took a little dip to open the week, but it was certainly nothing by which anybody was rattled or otherwise deterred from buying ever more expensive stocks.

Since the Great Financial Crisis of 2007-2009, the favorite acronym of traders has been BTD, otherwise known as Buy The Dip, which is exactly what is to be expected when markets open on Tuesday.

Almost without fail - actually, fully without fail - US equity indices, since March of 2009, have never fallen much more than a few percentage points before ramping back to new all-time highs. While there have been occasions in which the dip in stocks has persisted over a period of weeks or months, there has been no failure to recover in recent years.

Anybody invested on more than a casual basis is aware that central bank largesse and stock buybacks have been the primary drivers of stock market prosperity, and even with the Federal Reserve beginning to engage in the process of unwinding its balance sheet - selling off much of its horde of $4.5 million in bonds and other sketchy assets - there seems to be little to scare investors away from he equity bandwagon.

It's largely a controlled environment, nothing like the heydays of the 50s and 60s, when America was a growing concern and didn't need monetary boosts to fuel investment markets. Today's markets and investors are completely synthetic, consisting mainly of larger brokerages and funds of all types, from sovereign wealth types to hedges to mutuals to pensions. The general public and governments are so heavily invested in stocks that a collapse in markets would likely trigger catastrophic consequences to all parties. Private individuals would be harmed by pension promises unable to be met, while the large funds would face liquidation, bankruptcy or dissolution. Governments, likewise would be under attack for making pledges to the populace that could not be manifested over time, such as social security and other entitlements.

It is for those reasons, and the overall interconnectedness and fragility of markets that corrections do not occur. People in power would be without and instead of order, there would be chaos, and that is something that central bankers and their cohorts in the government realm simply cannot stomach.

At the Close, Monday, October 23, 2017:
Dow: 23,273.96, -54.67 (-0.23%)
NASDAQ: 6,586.83, -42.23 (-0.64%)
S&P 500: 2,564.98, -10.23 (-0.40%)
NYSE Composite: 12,384.42, -46.10 (-0.37%)

Bull or Bear? By October, It Probably Won't Matter

Another day, another boring stock market supposedly awaiting Janet Yellen's annual testimony before the the House Financial Services Committee on Wednesday and the Senate Finance Committee, Thursday.

Big YAWN.

Janet Yellen's words are worthless. She mouths big words like macro-prudential, as though she actually practices it while heads spin and eyes glaze over trying to comprehend its meaning.

In reality, the term refers to policy actions designed to mitigate systemic risk. It's rubbish. It's Fed-speak. While it sounds good on the surface, everything is at risk, including the entire global financial system that nearly imploded in 2008. If enough companies, or, heaven forbid, banks, default on their obligations, the risk is interconnected, and probably more so than in 2008-09.

There are no safeguards. There are only bigger bets, known as derivatives, credit default swaps (CDS), leverage, and arbitrage.

The system is as fragile now as it was just prior to the Great Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008-09, and probably, it is even more fragile, simply because the Fed does not have the tools to fight back against deflation and recession, the dual threats to capitalism.

So, Janet Yellen will testify to congress on Wednesday and nothing at all will change. Meanwhile, markets are stuck in neutral, which means, in these absurd times, a tilt toward slightly positive.

Another big YAWN.

The big moves will be in September, when the laid-back congress will be forced to raise the debt ceiling and come up with another annual budget. It's likely to be a wild time, even for this do-nothing congress. President Trump will be holding both Republican and Democrat feet to various fires.

If not September, then October should be another possible meltdown time frame. It always has been, and, with the markets and economy showing severe signs of fraud and stress, a market "event" is long, long overdue.

At the Close, 7/11/17:
Dow: 21,409.07, +0.55 (0.00%)
NASDAQ: 6,193.30, +16.91 (0.27%)
S&P 500: 2,425.53, -1.90 (-0.08%)
NYSE Composite: 11,746.72, -5.07 (-0.04%)

What Happened Friday? A Shaky Trend Is Developing

Strangely enough, the skyrocketing NASDAQ took a serve turn for the worse on Friday, dropping a massive 113 points at the same time the Dow was setting a new record with an 89-point gain and the NYSE Composite tacked on 65 points.

What drove the NASDAQ to its knees on Friday were the stocks known as FAANGs - Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Google - taking hits to their massively-overvalued share prices.

Here's the ugly reality
Facebook (FB) -5.11 (-3.30%); Apple (AAPL) -6.01 (-3.88%); Amazon (AMZN) -31.96 (-3.16%); Netflix (NFLX) -7.85 (-4.73%); Alphabet (parent of Google) (GOOG) -33.58 (-3.41%).

One-day, three-to-five-percent declines in any equity is usually a big deal. Having all of these institutionally-widely held stocks take a nosedive like that on a single day is a large, red, flashing warning sign that something is fundamentally wrong with the market, the economy, maybe even the world.

These shares weren't dumped all at once because somebody was taking profits. Volume was three times normal. Everybody was booking gains, and probably with good reason. The price/earning ratios for these tech darlings are unsustainable. Netflix leads the way with a P/E of 204, followed by Amazon, at 184, according to Yahoo Finance. Google seems modest by comparison, at 32. Facebook is 38, and Apple looks downright cheap with a P/E around 17.

So, only two of these stocks are wickedly overpriced, using standard metrics, but they all suffer some similar characteristics: They are all tech companies, based on the West coast, run by billionaire founders (excepting Apple, though Tim Cook was surely an heir apparent to Steve Jobs). The only other company that comes to mind with these characteristics is Microsoft (MSFT). The company founded by Bill Gates took a pretty good hit on Friday, down 1.63 (-2.27%).

Does this suggest that the "big one" is about to shake out the left coast, battering California from LA to San Jose with aftershocks up the coast to Seattle? And just how would anybody know that? OK, that theory falls into the category of tin-foil hat conspiracy theory, but, if Cali shakes, rattles and rolls someday soon, Money Daily will take credit for calling it (that's a joke, son).

Outside of Friday's tumult, general economic data has not been encouraging. First quarter GDP was 1.2% (second estimate), which is pretty close to stall speed. The US - and largely the global - economy has been anything but robust since the Great Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008-09. Captains of finance at places like the World Bank, the Fed, ECB, and elsewhere have been touting "recovery" for eight years, wherein none, in fact, has occurred, unless one peers only at stock charts all day. While stocks have soared on easy money accommodation, he same cannot be said of Main Street's outlook. Retail stores are closing everywhere in America, small business has already been dumped into the trash bin of history, and new company creation has hit a 27-year low. Additionally, the Fed is hell-bent on raising rates for the second time this year when the FOMC meets on Tuesday and Wednesday of this week.

What's troubling about the fall of the FAANGs is that these companies have largely benefitted off the backs of consumers, monopolizing markets and cannibalizing profits to the C-suite executives. Now, the largest shareholders - pension, mutual, and hedge funds - may be taking their money elsewhere, either to cash, bonds, or, maybe just to more stolid, established, dividend-paying stocks. It's tough to know, groupthink among the elites being difficult to gauge or define.

Whatever the case, with the smallish losses on the Dow and S&P earlier in the week followed by a fallout in the most speculative stocks establishes a trend, which, for now, we can only identify as "shaky."

With most stocks and indices hovering near all-time highs, shaky is not a word one would normally associate with risk-taking. The time to run is when the avalanche is first seen at the top of the mountain, not when it barrels into the lodge.

At the Close, 6/9/17:
Dow: 21,271.97, +89.44 (0.42%)
NASDAQ 6,207.92, -113.85 (-1.80%)
S&P 500 2,431.77, -2.02 (-0.08%)
NYSE Composite: 11,744.73, +65.78 (0.56%)

For the Week:
Dow: +65.68 (0.31%)
NASDAQ: -97.88 (-1.55%)
S&P 500: -7.30 (-0.30%)
NYSE Composite: +26.03 (0.22%)

The Market as The Matrix; Most People Took The Blue Pill

In case you’re not sure just what a “dead cat bounce” is, imagine taking a dead cat up to the top of a three-story building and dropping it to the ground.

It will bounce, but not much. This is precisely what occurred in US stocks on Thursday, the market getting a reprieve after Wednesday’s bloodbath.

One can try mightily to dissect the various moving parts of the market and arrive at pure conjecture as to what is happening any given day, but these days, reality has become stranger than fiction by massive degrees, even in such hallowed enclaves as financial markets, supposedly not prone to manipulation, fakery, or thievery, but that’s exactly what is on the table.

To say that the Fed, in conjunction with other central banks and their commercial bank proxies, own the market is likely a basic truth. To think that once owned, these players would not mold the narrative and the movement to exactly their liking, is the essence of naivety.

Since 2000, the markets have been owned, even more so since the Great Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008-09. Based on fiat money and dictates from money printers, the stock markets are the complete tool of enslavement. Governments, pensions, retirement funds, school districts, and all other manner of group investment are tied to “the market,” controlled by the Fed to never stop climbing, lest the debt-slavery of the American public become known.

If markets collapse, so to the deep state system of inflation and skimming, so don’t count on anything changing soon, President Trump or no President Trump, which is exactly why the deep state and the current residents of congress so oppose Mr/ Trump’s every move. He’s a threat to their control of the system.

It’s right out of the film, “The Matrix.” Most people took the blue pill.

Here's a short clip of Laurence Fishburne (Morpheus) explaining the Matrix to Keanu Reeves (Neo).


At The Close, 5/18/17:
Dow: 20,663.02, +56.09 (0.27%)
NASDAQ: 6,055.13, +43.89 (0.73%)
S&P 500: 2,365.72, +8.69 (0.37%)
NYSE Composite: 11,434.06, +10.53 (0.09%)

Dow At Record Highs 11 Staight Sessions; Eye On PPT, Central Bank Intervention

As has been the case for multiple sessions over many years, a rally in the final hour of trading pushed the Dow Jones Industrial Average to a new all-time high, with the NASDAQ and S&P averages also closing up, but short of record highs. They NYSE Composite was fractionally lower.

In the red the entire session, the Dow gained 70 points from 3:00 to 4:00 pm ET, with other major averages also gaining. This kind of activity has been a market feature since at least 2001, when the existence of the Plunge Protection Team (PPT) turned from urban myth to global reality. The PPT, created by Presidential Order #12631, signed on March 18, 1988 by President Ronald Reagan is also known as The Working Group on Financial Markets, is, in reality, a body of financial authorities consisting of:

• The Secretary of the Treasury, or his or her designee (as Chairperson of the Working Group);
• The Chairperson of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or his or her designee;
• The Chairperson of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or his or her designee; and
• The Chairperson of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Writers such as John Crudele of the New York Post have been critical of the Working Group's market-bending actions and foreign journalists from the Daily Telegraph and The Observer have suggested that the group has often exceeded its mandate.

Thus, tin-foil-hat type conspiracies have continued to suggest that the Federal Reserve and other central banks have been manipulating markets higher for years, and, while such coordinated action has yet to be unearthed by the mainstream media, sites such as ZeroHedge.com and other fringe outlets report that while the PPT may or may not be always active in markets, there's no doubt that central banks, notable, the European Central Bank (ECB), Swiss National Bank (SNB) and Bank of Japan (BOJ) are heavily invested in US and other global equities, making a mockery of the global regime of fiat money.

There are those who say intervention by government-sponsored agencies is not altogether nefarious, and some who believe such market-rigging is a good and reliable replacement for Adam Smith's "invisible hand" of the markets, it cannot be understated adequately that such activity will eventually undermine the integrity of financial markets and instruments.

Being based almost entirely upon faith and trust, financial markets have become the backbone of the global economy. If that faith and trust is broken - an unlikely occurrence, as the central banks, governments, and major brokerages work hand-in-hand largely toward the same end (higher stock prices) - the fragile system would crumble. An antecedent (and, much larger market) to the inner workings of financial markets is the bond market, which has also been pistol-whipped regularly by central bank policy and directive. On Friday, the US Treasury 10-Year Note fell to its lowest level in nearly three months, closing out the week at 2.3170, a direct result of higher stock prices, also known in the investing world as TINA (There Is No Alternative... to stocks).

With central banks and government agencies regularly interjecting themselves and their policies into financial markets, the natural question becomes: how stable and trustworthy are these markets and who gains from such manipulation?

Answering the question bluntly, the markets are only as stable as the institutions behind them, which is today a matter of considerable conjecture and discordant viewpoints. Purists posit that the mountains of debt produced by individuals, businesses, and governments is simply unsustainable and that a rout and crash, while unpredictable, is inevitable. The obvious conclusion to the other half of the question "qui bono" (who gains) is those in power and in control of such vast swaths of money, the governments, oligarchs, commercial and central banks. Beyond that, those in power consider themselves to be benefactors of the millions who gain from higher stock prices, inflation and boosts to massively underfunded pension funds.

With this degree of chutzpah in and on the minds of the central bankers and government leaders of the world, there is little doubt that they believe their actions to be highly beneficial to the orderly running of global finances while also not taking into account the falsity and pervasive inequities that are given rise by those same actions. Those with power over financial markets hold an incredible degree of responsibility, a responsibility that seemingly has gone beyond the pale, over the moon and into its own orbit.

Essentially, those who have questioned or taken positions contrary to the policies of the Fed and their brethren central banks, especially since the GFC of 2008, have been serially decimated in the markets. With stock indices raging without underlying fundamental bases, the planet may have reached a point of no return, wherein all matters financial are no longer in the control of individuals, but, rather, controlled by an opaque group of self-appointed masters.

One can only hope that they are well-grounded and essentially good-natured, because the alternatives would be brazen in concept and bizarre in execution.

At The Close, 2.24.17:
Dow: 20,821.76, +11.44 (0.05%)
NASDAQ: 5,845.31, +9.80 (0.17%)
S&P 500: 2,367.34, +3.53 (0.15%)
NYSE Composite: 11,541.29, -14.87 (-0.02%)

For the Week:
Dow: +197.71 (0.96%)
NASDAQ: +6.73 (0.12%)
S&P 500: +16.18 (0.69%)
NYSE Composite: +30.38 (0.26)

Bubble Superfecta: Dow, NASDAQ, S&P 500, NYSE Composite All Close At New Records

As the week comes to a stunning close, it's official, every market in America is officially in deep into bubble territory.

Consider that the major indices all closed at all-time highs today and that the Dow Jones Industrial Average is up a whopping 2200 points since election day, November 8, 2016. That amounts to a gain of just over 12% in three months. At that rate of ascent, 22,000 on the Dow should be a no-brainer by the end of 2017.

Nothing other than stupidity, other people's money, greed, and momentum were needed to foment one of the most rapid rises in the history of the Dow. The other indices have surely been along for the ride; even the broad measure of the entire NYSE Composite cracked to a record close today.

Not to suggest that a reversal is imminent (been that way for 6 years at least), but for some perspective, let's examine where these markets were at the depths of the Great Financial Crisis (GFC), on March 9, 2009.

Dow: 6,547.05
NASDAQ: 1,268.64
S&P 500: 676.53
NYSE Composite: 4,226.31

In the span of eight years, during what has ostensibly been the weakest recovery after a recession since the Great Depression, the Dow and S&P have more than tripled, the NASDAQ has more than quadrupled, and the poor old NYSE Comp. is just short of tripling.

So, if you missed it you missed it, but there still may be time to get in. Nobody knows where this is going to end, but we can all thank Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen for oodles of free cash injections worldwide (QE), zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) and the most reckless economic policies the world has ever witnessed.

It's still ongoing, though. The ECB and BOJ are still pumping money into their markets, and, unless you missed it, none other than the Swiss National Bank holds more than $64 billion in US equities.

Who said these central bankers don't know what they're doing?

Enjoy the weekend!

At the Close, Friday, February 10, 2017:
Dow: 20,269.37, +96.97 (0.48%)
NASDAQ: 5,734.13, +18.95 (0.33%)
S&P 500: 2,316.10, +8.23 (0.36%)
NYSE Composite: 11,377.72, +50.04 (0.44%)

For the Week:
Dow: +197.91 (0.99%)
NASDAQ: +67.36 (1.19%)
S&P 500: +18.68 (0.81%)
NYSE Composite: +50.04 (0.44%)