Toomey expressed his question to the Chairman, thusly:
“Some people are concerned that a flattening curve or inverted curve correlates with economic recession. Here’s my question: does a dramatic change in the shape of the yield curve in any way influence the trajectory you guys [the Fed] are on with respect to normalizing interest rates and the balance sheet?”
Quoting Chairman Powell's answer from the story:
“I think what really matters [about the yield curve] is what the neutral rate of interest is,” Powell said.
“And I think people look at the shape of the curve because they think that there’s a message in longer-run rates — which reflect many things — but that longer-run rates also tell us something, along with other things, about what the longer-run neutral rate is. That’s really, I think, why the slope of the yield curve matters. So I look directly at that.”
Literally, Powell did not answer the question, taking a page from the master of obscurity, mumbling, and ambiguity, former Fed Chairman, Alan Greenspan, who was notorious for answering questions and outlining positions in such an arcane and circuitous manner that it took the likes of William Safire to figure out just what he was saying, and even then, nobody was absolutely certain their analysis was correct.
Powell's rhetoric appeared to be pleasing to stock jockeys on Wall Street, who bid up prices a bit on the day, closing at its best level since June 14 (25,175.31). Perhaps Powell is embarking on a back-to-the-future nomenclature for the Federal Reserve, wherein the general public is to stand in awe of the special powers of the central bank and not question its motives.
That's how it was before and during Greenspan's reign as Chairman and maybe it might not be such a bad thing for the Fed to be less engaging and transparent today.
After all, nobody really understands what the Fed is talking about, including the Fed governors and presidents of the regional Fed banks, so why bother to try to explain it all to ordinary plebes, whose only wishes are to be left alone and offered a reasonable return on their investments?
Dow Jones Industrial Average July Scorecard:
| Date | Close | Gain/Loss | Cum. G/L |
| 7/2/18 | 24,307.18 | +35.77 | +35.77 |
| 7/3/18 | 24,174.82 | -132.36 | -96.59 |
| 7/5/18 | 24,345.44 | +181.92 | +85.33 |
| 7/6/18 | 24,456.48 | +99.74 | +185.07 |
| 7/9/18 | 24,776.59 | +320.11 | +505.18 |
| 7/10/18 | 24,919.66 | +143.07 | +648.25 |
| 7/11/18 | 24,700.45 | -219.21 | +429.04 |
| 7/12/18 | 24,924.89 | +224.44 | +653.48 |
| 7/13/18 | 25,019.41 | +94.52 | +748.00 |
| 7/16/18 | 25,064.36 | +44.95 | +792.95 |
| 7/17/18 | 25,119.89 | +55.53 | +848.48 |
At the Close, Tuesday, July 17, 2018:
Dow Jones Industrial Average: 25,119.89, +55.53 (+0.22%)
NASDAQ: 7,855.12, +49.40 (+0.63%)
S&P 500: 2,809.55, +11.12 (+0.40%)
NYSE Composite: 12,779.22, +30.44 (+0.24%)
Posts
