Stocks stumbled out of the gate Monday and remained in negative territory for the entire session as tensions in the Middle East and persistent inflation continued to worry investors. At the same time, higher yields in long-dated treasuries pulled skeptics out of dividend-paying stocks to the perceived safety of fixed income.
The logic is simple. Why hold stocks with three or four percent returns when two-year notes are throwing off a similar amount, risk-free. Stocks can rise or fall in price, which erodes gains, while bonds deliver monthly or quarterly returns without the worry.
Retirees, and the fund managers who handle their money, are moving to the safety of corporate and treasury paper, avoiding the drama. Baby Boomers, who represent the largest pools of investment funds, are sailing away toward Easy Street, now that the regime of low rates is finally dead and buried.
The only problem with this generational shift is that inflation continues to noisily erode purchasing power, though that is not a concern for the elderly armed with significant assets. They have enough continuing income from pensions, Social Security and long-held investments that make rising prices an annoyance rather than a base case concern.
The dynamics of geo-politics, midterms, and data center power grabs don't bother people in their 60s, 70s and 80s as much as it does working-class middle-aged individuals, who are still building retirement nest-eggs and looking for opportunities n stocks. Simplified, it may be assumed that Millennials are driving the speculative side of the market while Boomers are beginning to wind down equity holdings in favor of more and more treasury issuance, a relief to the government, which has been running low on buyers at a time when issuance is high and growing.
If the federal government insists on overspending and running larger and larger deficits, elderly Americans are increasingly more than happy to fund them at higher and higher rates. After all, holdings in treasury notes and bonds are funding some 20-30% of government expenditures, so anybody on Social Security might be said to be self-funding, getting a monthly stipend from the money they've lent to the government, plus a generous return. It's really a win-win for them.
There are a number of caveats to which the government should be paying attention. While there are roughly 10,000 Boomers retiring every day, 14,000 to 15,000 are dying at the same time. That means the government will be paying out less in benefits over time, net of annual COLAs, though, on the other hand side of the coin, their pool of potential investors will be shrinking. The government will also be spending more of the budget on interest on the debt, which, if rates continue to rise, means that spending amount will accelerate.
At some point there's a collision of interests. Maybe, when interest on the debt exceeds Social Security spend, Boomers, who are declining in number anyway, might not see investing with the government as a solid prospect. At that point, the government may run out of willing investors, though Millennials may pick up some of the slack. It's a problem without a solution at this point, but it's still a condition that may not become realized for another five years, when the last of the Baby Boomers (those born in 1964) reach full retirement age, making 2030-2031 appear as a possible inflection point.
In the meantime, stocks will continue their antics, but it is the funding mechanism - treasuries and other fixed income investments - that is calling the shots and sending the real signal. It's something to bear in mind when considering investment horizons.
As the open approaches on Tuesday, stock futures are higher, but only moderately. There are still too many issues in the finance and investment world under consideration to formulate a positive picture.
At the Close, Monday, September 28, 2026:
Dow: 51,481.51, -347.11 (-0.67%)
NASDAQ: 26,820.38, -248.34 (-0.92%)
S&P 500: 7,683.69, -59.72 (-0.77%)
NYSE Composite: 23,757.31, -155.28 (-0.65%)
No comments:
Post a Comment